2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.07.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of nonlinear offshore spar platform under wave and current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the natural period of surge motion, the predicted dynamic responses with the current decrease due to the increase of damping in the surge direction. It is the same as what was mentioned by Soeb et al [12]. On the other hand, the dynamic response of the tension of the upstream mooring line significantly increases due to the existence of the current.…”
Section: Validation Of the Advanved Hydrodynamic Models By The Water ...supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the natural period of surge motion, the predicted dynamic responses with the current decrease due to the increase of damping in the surge direction. It is the same as what was mentioned by Soeb et al [12]. On the other hand, the dynamic response of the tension of the upstream mooring line significantly increases due to the existence of the current.…”
Section: Validation Of the Advanved Hydrodynamic Models By The Water ...supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The fatigue life of mooring line was overestimated if the wave-current interaction was neglected. Soeb et al [12] observed that the current loads compressed the oscillation of surge, heave and pitch for a spar-type platform. However, the predicted dynamic responses of the platform and mooring line in these researches were not validated by the experiments and the same drag coefficient was used to predicted currentand wave-induced drag forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AQWA TM , WAMIT TM , and SESAM TM are examples of these software programs (Zou et al, 2023). Soeb et al (2017) conducted a motion response analysis on a spar platform in ultradeep sea conditions using ABAQUS/AQWA TM . They found a reduction in the motion response of a platform in heave and pitch degrees of freedom due to the current force.…”
Section: Article Highlightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, due to the formation of cracks, corrosion, or wear and tear, each facility moves into a latent form of an emergency state, corresponding to the period T 1 , inevitably followed by a period T 2 , when the facility moves into a critical emergency state. Finally, the period T 3 begins when an accident occurs and the facility ceases to operate [1,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%