2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of mouse skin to tattooing: use of SKH-1 mice as a surrogate model for human tattooing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
4
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many different animals have been used to investigate tattoos and their associated methods of removal, including pigs, 33 -36 mice, 37 guinea pigs 25,38,39 and rabbits. 40 Despite all animal models proving valid for tattoo studies, the pig was chosen for this study not only for the similarities between human and porcine integument systems but also primarily for the comparable ratio of skin surface area to body weight.…”
Section: Animal Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different animals have been used to investigate tattoos and their associated methods of removal, including pigs, 33 -36 mice, 37 guinea pigs 25,38,39 and rabbits. 40 Despite all animal models proving valid for tattoo studies, the pig was chosen for this study not only for the similarities between human and porcine integument systems but also primarily for the comparable ratio of skin surface area to body weight.…”
Section: Animal Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, 24, 48 und 72 Stunden sowie 8 Tage nach Abnahme des Applikations-Patches ergaben sich keine Hinweise auf eine Reizung (Bayer AG 1985). (Gopee et al 2005).…”
Section: Hautunclassified
“…injections at baseline levels. By contrast, Gopee and co-workers, who studied the immunological effect of tattooing with ink on dorsal skin in hairless mice, reported increased inflammation and necrosis within the epidermis until day 1 followed a decrease by day 3; inflammation and cell death were occurring later in the dermis, from day 3 onwards and persisted until day 7-10, depending upon the tested ink [247]. These discrepancies of cell death persistence could be attributed to the different needle sizes and geometries used here versus Gopee's group, as well as comparing dorsal versus ear skin, resulting in a ~4-fold skin thickness difference.…”
Section: Cell Death Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Tested in vitro with sonication, over 70% of cells were found to die at high intensities (0.54 MPa), presumably via an apoptotic pathway [214] -immune responses were not assessed in this particular study. Using tattooing devices, the effect of repeated needle penetration was investigated [247]. Not only was a local inflammation and haemorrhage in the treated murine tissue area visible, but also necrotic cell death in the epidermis as determined by histology.…”
Section: Cell Death and Innate Immune Responses To Vaccine Delivery Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation