2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of medical cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) genotypes to P supply under long photoperiod: Functional phenotyping and the ionome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
13
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A decline in photosynthesis, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance under higher P application (60 and 90 mg L −1 ) was found only in DQ plants at the first measurement. This resembles results that we have reported previously for the vegetative stage (Shiponi and Bernstein, 2021). Reduced photosynthesis as a result of P toxicity was observed in Hakea prostrata (Shane et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A decline in photosynthesis, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance under higher P application (60 and 90 mg L −1 ) was found only in DQ plants at the first measurement. This resembles results that we have reported previously for the vegetative stage (Shiponi and Bernstein, 2021). Reduced photosynthesis as a result of P toxicity was observed in Hakea prostrata (Shane et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The sensitivity of plant growth and development to P supply at the reproductive phase presented in this study are similar to responses we have recently reported for the vegetative phase (Shiponi and Bernstein, 2021). Responses to N and K nutrition are described in Saloner et al (2019) and Bernstein (2020, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regardless of evolutionary relationships, Cannabis is largely cultivated for medicinal and recreational use, and this has led to further categorization with regard to its relative cannabinoid concentrations, which broadly vary between the male and female plants (Small and Cronquist, 1976 ; Emboden, 1981 ; Hillig, 2005 ). Over time, cultivation and breeding of Cannabis plants led to the expansion of genetic variations, resulting in a range of cultivars with contrasting phenotypes, traits and secondary metabolite properties (Li, 1973 ; Clarke and Merlin, 2017 ; Saloner and Bernstein, 2020 ; Danziger and Bernstein, 2021a , b ; Shiponi and Bernstein, 2021 ). Despite technological advances in Cannabis breeding, the proportion of cannabinoids — or more specifically, of cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) — fluctuate greatly depending on various factors, including the sex of the parents (male or female), genotypes, cultivation practices, and biotic or abiotic stresses (Backer, et al, 2019 ; Saloner and Bernstein, 2020 ; Danziger and Bernstein, 2021a , b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%