Response of Lithuanian Winter Wheat Advanced Lines to Common Bunt (Tilletia tritici (BJERK.) WINT)

Ruzgas, Vytautas; Liatukas, Žilvinas

doi:10.2478/v10046-009-0010-0

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, they are not suitable for direct use in wheat production but can serve as donors of resistance genes in breeding programs (Ruzgas and Liatukas 2009;Matanguihan et al 2011). In compliance with this observation, the present study showed that bunt incidence was positively correlated with yield components (spike length, spikelet number and grain number in the main spike) in the progeny of 'Svilena' × A-38b cross.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 75%

Characterization of two wheat doubled haploid populations for resistance to common bunt and its association with agronomic traits

Ganeva

Landjeva

Belchev³

et al. 2014

Cereal Research Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two segregating populations of doubled haploid (DH) wheat lines derived androgenetically from crosses 'Svilena' (susceptible) × A-38b-4-5-3-3 (highly resistant) and 'Svilena' × WWRN (moderately resistant to moderately susceptible) were characterized for resistance to common bunt. Disease incidence was evaluated after inoculation of seeds with a mixture of Tilletia foetida teliospores in two autumn sown field experiments. Two-gene model of inheritance of resistance in line A-38b-4-5-3-3 was suggested. The transgressive segregation in the latter population was indicative for a quantitative mode of inheritance. The DH lines were assessed for plant height, heading time and important yield components in a three-year field experiment without bunt infection. In both populations, transgressive segregation was observed for all agronomic characteristics. Although the disease incidence was positively correlated with most of the agronomic traits, genotypes combining bunt resistance with good yield potential were isolated from 'Svilena' × A-38b set of lines. These genotypes are valuable for breeding varieties designed for growing in low-input and organic farming systems. The two DH populations are suitable to be used for further studies on the genetic basis of bunt resistance.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 75%

Characterization of two wheat doubled haploid populations for resistance to common bunt and its association with agronomic traits

Ganeva

Landjeva

Belchev³

et al. 2014

Cereal Research Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The extent of yield loss due to common and dwarf bunt in West and Northwest of Iran is estimated about %30 and %8.5 respectively, especially when seeds untreated with appropriate fungicide (Asadi & Behrozin, 1985;Mardoukhi, 1995;Sharifnabi & Hejadroud, 1992). Common bunt is the most main limitation in successful development of organic winter wheat due to a very limited number of resistant cultivars (Ruzgas & Liatukas, 2009) .The best method to control of bunts especially seed born bunts such as T. laevis and T. controversa, are using resistant cultivars and fungicides (Dumalasova & Bartos, 2010). But due to the destructive effects of chemical fungicides on the environment and natural resources, high costs and risk of pathogen resistance to fungicides, its seems that the most optimal way compatible with sustainable agriculture is using of high yielding resistant genotypes, because in addition to being effective in stability of organic agriculture, resistant cultivars are also reduce bunt incidence in the field.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reaction of Wheat Genotypes to T. laevis Kühn and T. controversa Kühn, the Common and Dwarf Bunts Pathogens in the Dry Highlands of Iran

Karimi¹,

Amini²,

Moradi³

et al. 2012

JAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Common and dwarf bunts are the most important diseases of wheat in the Kurdistan province, west of Iran. In this study, to investigate the reaction of wheat genotypes (grouped into two cold and warm season genotypes), they were evaluated for infection to common and dwarf bunts during 2007 and 2008 cropping seasons. Plant materials were groups of wheat genotypes included 82 and 158 genotypes from the cold and warm areas which were assessed in this study. For present study, wheat seeds were inoculated by common and dwarf bunts teliospores before planting, and sowing was accomplished during fall season of 2007 and 2008 at Ghamlou and Saral experimental stations. At maturity time, the percentage of infected heads and the main reactions were determined. Results revealed that resistance of genotypes to dwarf bunt was higher than common bunt and also bunt incidence of durum genotypes was relatively lower than bread wheat genotypes. The results demonstrated the existence of resistance gene analogues in durum wheat genotypes which could be used as donor progenitors. Replacement of durum wheat cultivars instead of bread wheat varieties could be an effective way in the developing of substantial farming.

show abstract

Alien fungi in Lithuania: list of species, current status and trophic structure

Motiejūnaitė

Markovskaja

Kutorga

et al. 2017

Botanica Lithuanica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motiejūnaitė J., Markovskaja S., Kutorga E., Iršėnaitė R., Kasparavičius J., Kačergius A., Lygis V., 2017: Alien fungi in Lithuania: list of species, current status and trophic structure. -Bot. Lith. 23(2): 139-152.A comprehensive inventory of alien fungi (excluding fungi-like oomycetes) recorded in Lithuania since the 19 th century was performed. The compiled list includes 142 fungal species, the major part of which are plant pathogens (125 species), while mycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi (eight and nine species, respectively) are much less represented. The distribution within country and current status of non-native fungi were assessed. Large part of alien fungus species (58) are considered as established, three species (Auricularia auricula-judae, Aureoboletus projectellus, Lecanosticta acicola) are currently spreading, three species (Serpula lacrymans, Synchytrium endobioticum, Tilletia caries) are decreasing, one (Laricifomes officinalis) is considered to be extinct, five saprotrophic species are ephemeromycetes with few records almost exceptionally indoors and not surviving in outside conditions. Status of more than half of the listed species (73) is categorized as unknown as their records are few, suitable habitats and/ or hosts are uncommon. The peak of alien fungus recording in Lithuania was in 1980-2000, apparently reflecting an increased frequency of international carriages and the highest peak of national mycological activities. Based on climate change scenarios for Lithuania, further increase of the numbers of alien species is being forecasted.

show abstract

Response of Lithuanian Winter Wheat Advanced Lines to Common Bunt (Tilletia tritici (BJERK.) WINT)

Cited by 3 publications

References 10 publications

Characterization of two wheat doubled haploid populations for resistance to common bunt and its association with agronomic traits

Characterization of two wheat doubled haploid populations for resistance to common bunt and its association with agronomic traits

Reaction of Wheat Genotypes to T. laevis Kühn and T. controversa Kühn, the Common and Dwarf Bunts Pathogens in the Dry Highlands of Iran

Alien fungi in Lithuania: list of species, current status and trophic structure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About