2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-05830-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of grain-size components of loess-paleosol sequence to Quaternary climate in the Southern Loess Plateau, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows three parameters of particle size, namely the percentages of <4 m (clay) particles and 4-63 m (silt) particles, and the median particle size d(0.5) [49]. As the figure indicates, in loess horizons L 1 of ZK04, which is located in the northernmost part of the Luohe River Basin, the average percentage of <4 m particles was 13.95%, the average percentage of 4-63 m particles was 86.05%, and the average median particle size was 28.35 m. In paleosol S 1 , the average percentage of clay particles was 18.06%, that of silt particles was 81.84%, and the average median particle size was 24.06 m. For ZK18, located in the central region, the average percentage of <4 m particles was 22.12%, that of 4-63 m particles was 77.87%, and the average median particle size was 17.29 m in loess horizons L 1 .…”
Section: Differences In Spatial Characteristics Of Magnetic Susceptib...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows three parameters of particle size, namely the percentages of <4 m (clay) particles and 4-63 m (silt) particles, and the median particle size d(0.5) [49]. As the figure indicates, in loess horizons L 1 of ZK04, which is located in the northernmost part of the Luohe River Basin, the average percentage of <4 m particles was 13.95%, the average percentage of 4-63 m particles was 86.05%, and the average median particle size was 28.35 m. In paleosol S 1 , the average percentage of clay particles was 18.06%, that of silt particles was 81.84%, and the average median particle size was 24.06 m. For ZK18, located in the central region, the average percentage of <4 m particles was 22.12%, that of 4-63 m particles was 77.87%, and the average median particle size was 17.29 m in loess horizons L 1 .…”
Section: Differences In Spatial Characteristics Of Magnetic Susceptib...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paleoclimate information has been interpreted based on loess properties, such as grain size [1,[29][30][31] and magnetic susceptibility [32][33][34][35]. The paleoclimate signals recorded in loess might have been modified to varying degrees by post-depositional processes, such as pedogenesis, which is a weathering process, which occurs under relatively warm and humid conditions [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stratigraphy has expanded into several branches, such as petrostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and climatostratigraphy (Layzell et al, 2017). The methods and indicators for exploring the age of strata have been simultaneously enriched, and radiocarbon, sample size, microsomal paleontology, and sporulation have become important indicators for the study of stratigraphic depositional sequences and paleoenvironmental evolution (Frieling and Sluijs, 2018;Frydas and Keupp, 2015;Wang et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2020). Gu et al (2018) have comprehensively studied the evolution of the Quaternary sedimentary environment in the Han River basin by analyzing lithological, grain-size, and magnetic assemblages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%