2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(03)00282-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Fe powder, purified and as-produced HiPco single-walled carbon nanotubes to flash exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
34
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The iron oxide particles that remained after our combustion were much larger than any particles that were in the initial mixture. This reinforces the observation by Smits et al [4] that the Fe particles melted and coalesced as the oxidation continued. Since the nanosized Fe particles are pyrophoric, it is believed that the SWCNTs must stabilize the Fe particles as mentioned before.…”
Section: Report Documentation Pagesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The iron oxide particles that remained after our combustion were much larger than any particles that were in the initial mixture. This reinforces the observation by Smits et al [4] that the Fe particles melted and coalesced as the oxidation continued. Since the nanosized Fe particles are pyrophoric, it is believed that the SWCNTs must stabilize the Fe particles as mentioned before.…”
Section: Report Documentation Pagesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Ignition did not occur if the pile of SWCNTs were compacted before being exposed to a flash light. There is no reason to believe that the metal oxides which remained in our tests are any different than what Brady et al [3] and Smits et al [4] described. The orangecolored material is most likely iron oxides Fe 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 4 .…”
Section: Report Documentation Pagecontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations