Response of Families to Two Preventive Intervention Strategies: Long-Term Differences in Behavior and Attitude Change

Beardslee, William R.; Wright, Ellen J.; Rothberg, Phyllis Clarke; Salt, Patricia; Versage, Eve

doi:10.1097/00004583-199606000-00017

Cited by 85 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Results showed that families reported improvements across many areas of behavior and attitude consistent with better child outcomes (Beardslee et al 1997a(Beardslee et al , 1997cBeardslee, Wright, Rothberg, Salt, & Versage, 1996b). These changes included improved family and parent-child communication, increased communication between parents and children about depression, and adoption of new family/parenting coping strategies, among others.…”

Section: Therapeuticmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two programs provide noteworthy exception. Beardslee and colleagues have developed an intervention for families and children ages 8 to 15 years, in which one of the parents has had a recent hospitalization for an affective diagnosis (Beardslee et al, 1996b(Beardslee et al, , 1997a(Beardslee et al, , 1997c. Based on the literature of risk and resilience, the intervention uses a psychoeducational approach to educate parents about the potential impact of their illness on children, and to enhance communication between parents and children about mental illness.…”

Section: Limited Evaluation Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Critical Issues for Parents with Mental Illness and their Families

Nicholson¹,

Biebel²,

Hinden³

et al. 2001

PsycEXTRA Dataset

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Therapeuticmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limited Evaluation Resourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Issues for Parents with Mental Illness and their Families

Nicholson¹,

Biebel²,

Hinden³

et al. 2001

PsycEXTRA Dataset

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Longitudinal studies of children and adolescents experiencing subsyndromal mood symptoms emphasize the clinical and public health importance of these conditions (23,84,85). There is preliminary evidence that brief, familybased, psychoeducational interventions decrease the deleterious effects of parental mood disorder on children (103,104) and improve the family climate of mood-disordered children (105). Further, individual and family psychoeducational interventions in adult bipolar patients and their families have been shown to decrease relapse rates and improve overall functioning (101,106).…”

Section: Prevention and Early Intervention Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward Effective Early Intervention and Prevention Strategies for Major Affective Disorders: A Review of Antecedents and Risk Factors

Duffy

2000

Can J Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conclusions: Substantial evidence supports the effectiveness ofearly intervention and prevention efforts in children at riskfor mood disorders (identified as having affectedfamily members) and in adolescents manifesting significant mood symptoms and syndromes (especially if associated with a positive family history). However, the current level of understanding regarding the etiological significance and mechanism ofrisk factors associated with mood disorders does not support broad community-based primary prevention strategies in unselected populations.(Can J Psychiatry 2000;45:340-348)

show abstract

“…There is a growing body of research that assesses the effects of health interventions on multiple family members [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Beardslee and colleagues [10][11][12] implemented a series of randomized trials designed for depressed parents and their children, with the goal of affecting outcomes for multiple family members.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is a family equal to the sum of its parts? Estimating family-level well-being for cost-effectiveness analysis

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cost-effectiveness (CEA) analysis of health interventions focuses primarily on individual-level costs and benefits. However, health interventions intended for individuals often have implications for other members of an individual's family and the overall functioning of the family. While researchers have assessed the effects of health interventions on multiple family members, CEA has not routinely incorporated measures of effectiveness or costs from multiple family members. We could imagine, however, that CEA might over- or under-estimate the effects of health interventions if they are limited to individuals targeted by the intervention. Family-level CEA would consider the well-being of and costs borne by multiple family members in response to an individual-level intervention, and potentially lead to more appropriate resource allocation. Using the health plan as a working frame of reference, we explore conceptual issues related to estimating effectiveness at the level of the family for use in CEA.

show abstract

Response of Families to Two Preventive Intervention Strategies: Long-Term Differences in Behavior and Attitude Change

Cited by 85 publications

References 24 publications

Critical Issues for Parents with Mental Illness and their Families

Critical Issues for Parents with Mental Illness and their Families

Toward Effective Early Intervention and Prevention Strategies for Major Affective Disorders: A Review of Antecedents and Risk Factors

Is a family equal to the sum of its parts? Estimating family-level well-being for cost-effectiveness analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About