“…The outstanding question, however, is what role the SOM plays throughout the entire skeletonbuilding process. Arguments that skeletal accretion is entirely biologically controlled, independent of calcifying fluid pH or Ar (Von Euw et al, 2017), cannot be reconciled with the abundant evidence that calcification is sensitive to seawater carbonate chemistry (Langdon et al, 2003;Langdon and Atkinson, 2005;Cohen et al, 2009;Chan and Connolly, 2013;Comeau et al, 2013Comeau et al, , 2017Drenkard et al, 2013;Venn et al, 2013) or with geochemical evidence that coral skeletons are precipitated from a seawater-like solution (McConnaughey, 1989;Adkins et al, 2003;Cohen and McConnaughey, 2003;Gaetani and Cohen, 2006;Gagnon et al, 2007Gagnon et al, , 2012Trotter et al, 2011;McCulloch et al, 2012McCulloch et al, , 2017D'Olivo and McCulloch, 2017). Yet, that SOM may be involved as a template for initial crystal nucleation in COCs, as a buffer of calcifying fluid pH, or as a means to control the size and orientation of crystals, is consistent with the available evidence and with the original hypothesis of Barnes (1970).…”