2003
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2003)129:7(759)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Continuous System with Stochastically Varying Surface Roughness to Moving Load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flatness is a condition where a surface has all its elements in one plane [94], which indicates a condition of being completely a planar surface. When a flatness control is applied to a surface, it demonstrates the amount of deviation in flatness that a surface is allowed to have [94]. When the…”
Section: Flatnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flatness is a condition where a surface has all its elements in one plane [94], which indicates a condition of being completely a planar surface. When a flatness control is applied to a surface, it demonstrates the amount of deviation in flatness that a surface is allowed to have [94]. When the…”
Section: Flatnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flatness is a condition where a surface has all its elements in one plane [94], which indicates a condition of being completely a planar surface. When a flatness control is applied to a surface, it demonstrates the amount of deviation in flatness that a surface is allowed to have [94]. When the flatness of a component is critical, such as the whole or part of a floor surface, the flatness control is applied [92], regardless of the thickness, the size dimension, or other features that may also be specified [17].…”
Section: Flatnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a vehicle traverses a short-to mid-span highway bridge, which is usually rather rigid with, for example, concrete box-girders, the bridge-vehicle system can be sufficiently decoupled to a beam moving-force model (Cebon, 1999;Pan and Li, 2002;Pesterev et al, 2003;Pesterev et al, 2004;Schenk and Bergman, 2003;Yang et al, 2000), i.e., the bridge (modeled as an elastic beam) is subjected to a time-variant tire force ( ) P t moving across it. In this paper, ( ) P t is taken as a constant P for each of the passing vehicles, which accounts for the static tire force, or the weight of the vehicle.…”
Section: Modeling and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that, for short-to mid-span concrete highway bridges, in the normal range of vehicle speeds, large dynamic tire forces are due mainly to road surface irregularity, rather than bridge-vehicle interactions (Schenk and Bergman, 2003;Yang et al, 2000;Pesterev et al, 2003;Pesterev et al, 2004). As a result, decoupling the bridge-vehicle system leads to the moving load model, i.e.…”
Section: Beam-moving Load Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%