2001
DOI: 10.1080/02827580152699385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Coniferous Forest Ecosystems on Mineral Soils to Nutrient Additions: A Review of Swedish Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
156
3
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
156
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected positive effects of forest liming are the deacidification of soil and seepage water, and the increase in Ca and Mg supply of the soil [2], which may have been decreased by various processes of soil acidification [4]. However, negative effects have also occurred: emission of CO 2 due to the loss of organic matter [22,32], NO − 3 leaching [25], and reduced tree growth [31,36]. Therefore, forest liming is still controversial in Central and Northern Europe [19,24,27,31,32,36,41] and the various foci and interpretations of the findings of the acidification/liming problems have resulted in very diverse policies, especially in the German states [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expected positive effects of forest liming are the deacidification of soil and seepage water, and the increase in Ca and Mg supply of the soil [2], which may have been decreased by various processes of soil acidification [4]. However, negative effects have also occurred: emission of CO 2 due to the loss of organic matter [22,32], NO − 3 leaching [25], and reduced tree growth [31,36]. Therefore, forest liming is still controversial in Central and Northern Europe [19,24,27,31,32,36,41] and the various foci and interpretations of the findings of the acidification/liming problems have resulted in very diverse policies, especially in the German states [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from increasing tree growth, N fertilization could affect forest ecosystems in other ways, such as reduced biodiversity of plants, mosses and lichens and ectomycorrhizal fungi. The increasing awareness of the deposition of air-pollution N and its possible effects have raised serious concerns regarding the suitability of fertilizing forests with N (Nohrstedt 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term research on 61 the effects of forest fertilization on biomass yield has shown that significant increases in 62 production can be achieved (Nohrstedt, 2001; Pettersson and Högbom, 2004). A great need (Tamm, 1991;Nohrstedt, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher forest biomass production can be achieved by better silvicultural measures, including 44 addition of nitrogen (N) being the main limiting nutrient in boreal forests (Nohrstedt, 2001). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%