2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of coliform populations in streambed sediment and water column to changes in nutrient concentrations in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For ORP, the points P3, P4 and P5 were not significantly different, but they differed from points P1 and P2 when all samplings were averaged. According to Corcóvia and Celligoi (2012) and Shelton et al (2014) in their ORP analyses of different water samples, their values were close to those obtained for the last three points in this study. In addition, the external factors that contributed most to these results were environmental pollution, exhaust gases and pesticides (Corcóvia;Celligoi, 2012).…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Variables: Spatial And Temporal Variabsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For ORP, the points P3, P4 and P5 were not significantly different, but they differed from points P1 and P2 when all samplings were averaged. According to Corcóvia and Celligoi (2012) and Shelton et al (2014) in their ORP analyses of different water samples, their values were close to those obtained for the last three points in this study. In addition, the external factors that contributed most to these results were environmental pollution, exhaust gases and pesticides (Corcóvia;Celligoi, 2012).…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Variables: Spatial And Temporal Variabsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the viability, persistence and metabolic activity within or between indicator species is not constant in the environment (Anderson et al, 2005). For example, the metabolic activity of a bioluminescent strain of E. coli O157:H7 decreased due to exposure to salt water, whilst elevated nutrients boosted its microbial activity (Williams et al, 2007) possibly resulting in growth (Shelton et al, 2014) or reduction in inactivation (Garzio-Hadzick et al, 2010). In most fresh and marine waters, metabolic activity rapidly declines after release from feces, which may result from insufficient carbon source or absence of host factors (Thorn et al, 2011; Li et al, 2014).…”
Section: Sediment Characteristics Governing Bacteria Particle Interacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in freshwater systems, the number of E. coli released in successive events are limited to the deposited/proliferated bacteria between events (Shelton et al, 2014) and the sediment depth which is subject to scour (Harvey et al, 2012). The bacterial abundance increases in the water column on the rising curve of the storm hydrograph, due to particulate resuspension under periods of high turbulence (Howlett et al, 2015) often with a delay between the peak in riverflow and the peak in bacterial abundance (Jamieson R. C. et al, 2005; Jamieson R. et al, 2005; Henson et al, 2007).…”
Section: Sediments As a Sink/source Of Fecal Bacteria And Viruses?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many prior studies that evaluated FIB data focused solely on individual beaches or small clusters of beaches. They have focused on evaluating measureable water quality and parameters such as temperature (Leight et al 2016), rainfall (Farnham and Lall 2015), nutrient availability (Shelton et al 2014), hydrodynamics (Feng et al, 2013, He et al, 2007, Ge et al 2012, Rodrigues et al 2016), and sediment (Solo-Gabriele et al 2000, Desmarais et al 2002, Frey et al 2015). Some have been more comprehensive in evaluating beach water quality for the states of California (Dorsey 2010, Yamahara et al 2007) and Florida (Feng et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%