2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859618000692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of canopy structure, light interception and grain yield to plant density in maize

Abstract: Good canopy structure is essential for optimal maize (Zea mays L.) production. However, creating appropriate maize canopy structure can be difficult, because the characteristics of individual plants are altered by changes in plant age, density and interactions with neighbouring plants. The objective of the current study was to find a reliable method for building good maize canopy structure by analysing changes in canopy structure, light distribution and grain yield (GY). A modern maize cultivar (ZhengDan958) w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(67 reference statements)
3
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, higher plant density resulted in lower N uptake per plant, but significantly increased the N accumulation per area, irrespective of the soil conditions (Xu et al, 2017a; Nelson et al, 2015). Our LA results are in agreement with Li et al (2018) and Qian et al (2016). These authors also found that the LA per plant decreased linearly with increasing plant population under diverse soil and climate conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In previous studies, higher plant density resulted in lower N uptake per plant, but significantly increased the N accumulation per area, irrespective of the soil conditions (Xu et al, 2017a; Nelson et al, 2015). Our LA results are in agreement with Li et al (2018) and Qian et al (2016). These authors also found that the LA per plant decreased linearly with increasing plant population under diverse soil and climate conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…K c1 is equal to 0.30 during the early season, 1.20 during the mid-season, and 0.35 during the late season; K c2 is 0.60 during the early season, 1.15 during the midseason, and 0.70 during the late season (Allen et al, 1998). The extinction coefficient k is equal to 0.39 for corn (Li et al, 2018) and 0.65 for tomato (Cruz et al, 2014). The emitter fluxes in the corn and tomato regions were represented in HYDRUS-2D with two 10 cm long time-variable boundary conditions and were calculated as follows:…”
Section: Initial and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each experimental site, the crops were kept free from pests, weeds, and diseases using standard approved pesticides. Further information can be found in [23,27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these showed that the optimum plant population density can be evaluated using the relationship between population-level GY and plant population density because the population-level GY responds to the plant population density in a parabolic fashion; the suitable plant population density was obtained at the highest population-level GY [21,22]. Other studies confirmed that the optimum plant density can be evaluated based on Beer's law equation and the optimum light interception (95% of light interception) [12,23]. Moreover, there are still some studies showed that the optimum plant density can be evaluated using maize growth models, such as the Crop-Environment Resource Synthesis (CERES) Maize model [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%