Response of Biodiversity, Ecosystems, and Ecosystem Services to Climate Change in China: A Review

Abstract

Climate change is having a significant impact on the global ecosystem and is likely to become increasingly important as this phenomenon intensifies. Numerous studies in climate change impacts on biodiversity, ecosystems, and ecosystem services in China have been published in recent decades. However, a comprehensive review of the topic is needed to provide an improved understanding of the history and driving mechanisms of environmental changes within the region. Here we review the evidence for changes in climate and the peer-reviewed literature that assesses climate change impacts on biodiversity, ecosystem, and ecosystem services at a China scale. Our main conclusions are as follows. (1) Most of the evidence shows that climate change (the increasing extreme events) is affecting the change of productivity, species interactions, and biological invasions, especially in the agro-pastoral transition zone and fragile ecological area in Northern China. (2) The individuals and populations respond to climate change through changes in behavior, functions, and geographic scope. (3) The impact of climate change on most types of services (provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural) in China is mainly negative and brings threats and challenges to human well-being and natural resource management, therefore, requiring costly societal adjustments. In general, although great progress has been made, the management strategies still need to be further improved. Integrating climate change into ecosystem services assessment and natural resource management is still a major challenge. Moving forward, it is necessary to evaluate and research the effectiveness of typical demonstration cases, which will contribute to better scientific management of natural resources in China and the world.

Estimating the Economic Values of Restricted Monoculture Eucalyptus Plantations: A Choice Modeling Approach

“…Multinomial logit results indicated that all attribute variables significantly and positively influenced residents’ willingness to pay for the improvement programs. This conclusion is in line with the studies by [ 64 , 65 , 66 ] that reported significant variations in preferences of residents and tourists regarding the Green Island environmental resources in Taiwan.…”

Forestry offsets under China’s certificated emission reduction (CCER) for carbon neutrality: regulatory gaps and the ways forward

“…Most studies on China’s climate change response have focused on energy structure transition (Xu, 2021), carbon emission trading (Yan et al , 2020), renewable energy quotas (Xiong et al , 2014) and electricity price subsidies (Ouyang and Lin, 2014). In contrast, few studies have systemically addressed China’s forestry offsets regulations (Yang et al , 2021). However, institutional issues play a critical role in effective forestry offsets.…”

Research and application of GEP: China’s experience in natural capital accounting

“…While maintaining global biodiversity, it supports about 7.6 billion people and provides services vital to human wellbeing, health, livelihood, and survival (Costanza et al, 1997;Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Panel, 2005;Nelson et al, 2009;TEEB Foundations, 2010;Maes et al, 2016). However, under the background of extensive global climate change and the continuous impact of human activities (Chen et al, 2021;Cobb et al, 2021;Ellis et al, 2021;Grant et al, 2021;Ouyang et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2021), the global ecosystem degradation has intensified, and 60% of ecosystems are degraded, more than 30% of natural freshwater disappears, and the forest is reduced by 10 million ha each year (Havsen et al, 2013;Andrew and Erin, 2019). The global ecosystem is still facing the weakening of ecosystem services and the depletion of natural resources in the future, which seriously threatens the survival of mankind.…”

“…Ouyang et al believe that GEP, as an indicator of ecosystem contribution to the economy, can provide a basis for carrying out the research on the realistic mechanism of ecological products and transforming the value of ecological products into economic benefits (Ouyang et al, 2016;Ouyang et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2021). The Chinese government has recognized the importance of protecting and restoring ecosystem assets.…”