1994
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<0239:roatdd>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of a Two-Dimensional Dual-Doppler Radar Wind Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of traditional dual-Doppler analysis methods have shown that wind retrieval errors can be substantially reduced through the judicious selection of the interpolation scheme used to map the Doppler velocity observations to the Cartesian analysis grid (Given and Ray 1994;Trapp and Doswell 2000;Majcen et al 2008). Determining the optimal interpolation procedure for a particular problem, however, can be very challenging.…”
Section: B Sensitivity To Interpolation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies of traditional dual-Doppler analysis methods have shown that wind retrieval errors can be substantially reduced through the judicious selection of the interpolation scheme used to map the Doppler velocity observations to the Cartesian analysis grid (Given and Ray 1994;Trapp and Doswell 2000;Majcen et al 2008). Determining the optimal interpolation procedure for a particular problem, however, can be very challenging.…”
Section: B Sensitivity To Interpolation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matejka and Bartels (1998) examined the impact of random, bias, and trend errors in the 2D divergence estimates on the analyzed vertical wind for a number of retrieval methods. Given and Ray (1994), Trapp and Doswell (2000), and Majcen et al (2008) explored the sensitivity of Cartesian analyses to the procedure used to interpolate observations to the analysis grid. Clark et al [1980 (CHM80)] performed multiple-Doppler analyses of pseudo-observations of a numerically simulated severe multicellular storm and examined the impacts of random observational errors, temporal errors due to advection and evolution of the wind field, and, in the dual-Doppler case, unfavorable cross-beam angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another error source that we did not consider in this study is the hydrometeor fall speed estimate, which is generally estimated from radar reflectivity. The sophisticated attenuation correction techniques in particular for shorter wavelength radars (e.g., Kim et al, 2008;Gu et al, 2011) and best estimates of hydrometeor fall speeds (Giangrande et al, 2013) are required to reduce the wind retrieval uncertainties. In brief, the retrieval of the high-quality vertical velocities in the upper part of convective clouds is very challenging, while the multi-Doppler-radar vertical velocity retrievals have been conventionally used to evaluate the CRM simulated dynamical fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primarily statistical techniques, which are often termed objective analysis, include ad hoc methods such as Cressman (1959) successive correction (see Given and Ray (1994) for an application; see Trapp and Doswell (2000) and Askelson et al (2000) for discussion of the use of this technique in the analysis of radar data), to optimal interpolation techniques (Gandin, 1963;Thiébaux and Pedder, 1987;see Sokolov and Rintoul (1999) for a recent inter-comparison of techniques). In the latter, care is often taken to model the spatial correlation structure of forecast errors so as to maintain the dynamical balance between forecast parameters, such as geopotential and winds (e.g.…”
Section: Weather Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%