2012
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2012.699743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of a tank under blast loading – part II: experimental structural response and simplified analytical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the shockwave energy induced by a laser breakdown is at least two orders lower than that of an exploding wire, the time of deposit is such that powers (W•m −1 ) are the same order. As the initiation of direct gaseous detonation is due to the coupling energy/power in the cylindrical case [35], the laser source is a potential candidate to replace the exploding wire in risk study [36]. The potential benefits are in terms of safety (the ignition device is outside the gaseous charge) and energy control to generate both gaseous deflagrations and detonations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the shockwave energy induced by a laser breakdown is at least two orders lower than that of an exploding wire, the time of deposit is such that powers (W•m −1 ) are the same order. As the initiation of direct gaseous detonation is due to the coupling energy/power in the cylindrical case [35], the laser source is a potential candidate to replace the exploding wire in risk study [36]. The potential benefits are in terms of safety (the ignition device is outside the gaseous charge) and energy control to generate both gaseous deflagrations and detonations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hardly any progress has been made in understanding the dynamic response of liquid storage tanks under blast loading [11]. A review of the literature shows that several researchers [6,[12][13][14] have investigated the influence of blast intensity, tank fill conditions, and tank bottom constraints on tanks' failure mode, resultant displacement and deformation, structural energy, circumferential strain, and longitudinal strain. Moreover, small-scale model experiments have been mostly conducted to study the response of thin-wall cylindrical tanks subjected to blast load [3,6], and the findings have been verified using numerical simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%