2019
DOI: 10.3390/jmse7100369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of a Porous Seabed around an Immersed Tunnel under Wave Loading: Meshfree Model

Abstract: Seabed instability surrounding an immersed tunnel is a vital engineering issue regarding the design and maintenance for submarine tunnel projects. In this study, a numerical model based on the local radial basis function collocation method (LRBFCM) is developed to evaluate the seabed behaviour in a marine environment, in which the seabed is treated as the porous medium and governed by Biot's "u − p" approximation. As for the flow field above the seabed, the VARANS equations are used to simulate the fluid motio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenomenon of the fluid-seabed interactions has been analytically investigated under various conditions without a structure (Yamamoto et al, 1978;Madsen, 1978;Hsu and Jeng, 1994;Zhang et al, 2013). When a structure is considered, the complicated boundary conditions make the numerical analyses indispensable, such as submarine pipelines (Jeng and Lin, 1999;Gao et al, 2003;Zhao et al, 2014;Zhao and Jeng, 2016;Lin et al, 2016;Duan et al, 2017;Li et al, 2019;Liang et al, 2020;Liang and Jeng, 2021), breakwaters (Jeng et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2018a;Celli et al, 2019), coastal slopes (Young et al, 2009), offshore wind turbine foundations (Chang and Jeng, 2014;Qi and Gao, 2014;Sui et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2017;Zhao et al, 2017;Li et al, 2018) and immersed tunnels (Han et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2021) etc. The structure-seabed interactions may introduce additional complexities, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon of the fluid-seabed interactions has been analytically investigated under various conditions without a structure (Yamamoto et al, 1978;Madsen, 1978;Hsu and Jeng, 1994;Zhang et al, 2013). When a structure is considered, the complicated boundary conditions make the numerical analyses indispensable, such as submarine pipelines (Jeng and Lin, 1999;Gao et al, 2003;Zhao et al, 2014;Zhao and Jeng, 2016;Lin et al, 2016;Duan et al, 2017;Li et al, 2019;Liang et al, 2020;Liang and Jeng, 2021), breakwaters (Jeng et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2018a;Celli et al, 2019), coastal slopes (Young et al, 2009), offshore wind turbine foundations (Chang and Jeng, 2014;Qi and Gao, 2014;Sui et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2017;Zhao et al, 2017;Li et al, 2018) and immersed tunnels (Han et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2021) etc. The structure-seabed interactions may introduce additional complexities, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al [4] investigate the flow field dynamics and corresponding response of a porous seabed around an immersed tunnel under wave loading combined current with various velocities. They developed a 2D numerical model, which is composed of two sub-models: The flow model with OpenFOAM and the seabed model with a Meshfree method, to simulate the fluid-structure-seabed interaction.…”
Section: Papers Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue collected 14 papers that cover different aspects of marine engineering geology and geotechnics using different approaches. Some of them used numerical simulations [1][2][3][4][5], some conducted laboratory experiments [6][7][8][9][10], and others acquired and analyzed field or laboratory tests to establish a theoretical modeling framework for predicting marine sediment properties and the potential hazards [11][12][13][14]. Moreover, with a timely and well-organized publication, it is believed that the state-of-the-art data, analyses, and methodologies presented in this Special Issue could be of great interest to all readers of Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of a pure seabed without a structure, several analytical solutions have been developed under various conditions [12][13][14][15]. However, for a seabed including structures such as submarine pipelines [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], breakwaters [27][28][29], coastal slopes [30], offshore wind turbine foundations [31][32][33][34][35][36][37], gravity-based structure (GBS) offshore platforms [38], dumbbell-shaped cofferdams [39], and immersed tunnels [40,41], the presence of the structures complicates the boundary conditions, generally requiring numerical methods for analyses. Recently, Li et al [42] developed an open-source numerical toolbox for simulating the interaction between a porous seabed, waves, and structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%