2017
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response in a child with a BRAF V600E mutated desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma upon retreatment with vemurafenib

Abstract: Infants with low-grade glioma (LGG) and diencephalic syndrome have a poor outcome. The patient described here had a desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma harboring a BRAF V600E mutation. After relapse following initial standard chemotherapy treatment, he was successfully treated with the BRAF V600E inhibitor vemurafenib at the age of 3 years 11 months and 5 years 0 months. A rapid response was observed on both occasions. This illustrates the possibility of continuous oncogenic addiction and the therapeutic potent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, re-initiation of trametinib treatment in one of the patients from the present cohort patients was able to stop progression and to induce a second disease stabilization (SD). This indicates that the tumor did not develop a bona fide resistance but retained its susceptibility towards the inhibitor, and that re-challenge with the same drug is an option, as has been reported for BRAFi [39]. The phenomenon of occasional rapid progression after MEKi treatment seems to be a class-specific effect, since it was also observed in the present study and is thus not restricted to selumetinib.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Of note, re-initiation of trametinib treatment in one of the patients from the present cohort patients was able to stop progression and to induce a second disease stabilization (SD). This indicates that the tumor did not develop a bona fide resistance but retained its susceptibility towards the inhibitor, and that re-challenge with the same drug is an option, as has been reported for BRAFi [39]. The phenomenon of occasional rapid progression after MEKi treatment seems to be a class-specific effect, since it was also observed in the present study and is thus not restricted to selumetinib.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…36,37 Although its use in pediatric patients has generally been limited, in part due to the difficulty of studying adequate numbers of pediatric PTC patients in clinical trials, 38 there are a number of case reports of children with BRAF V600E-positive tumors whose disease responded to treatment. [39][40][41] One recently FDA-approved agent is larotrectinib, a highly selective small-molecule inhibitor of the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) proteins (encoded by kinase genes NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3), which has demonstrated potent antitumor efficacy in both children and adults with TRK fusion-positive tumors. 42,43 Notably and patients gain experience with these therapies in pediatrics, we anticipate the demand for such treatments will increase for selected patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease-specific phase 2 component of the study is ongoing. Similarly, early reports of promising vemurafenib activity in children with recurrent BRAF V600E mutant pLGG treated (46, 47) led to the ongoing Pacific Neuro-Oncology Consortium (PNOC) phase I trial of vemurafenib in children with recurrent or refractory gliomas containing the BRAF V600E mutation (NCT01748149).…”
Section: Targeted Treatments For Pediatric Lggmentioning
confidence: 99%