2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response function and linearity for high energy γ-rays in large volume LaBr3:Ce detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency was 0.90% at 1.836 MeV (measured by using a 88 Y source), a value reproduced within 2.0% by a Monte Carlo simulation for this experiment obtained by using the code GEANT4 [23]. At higher energies the efficiency was measured with different radioactive sources and high-energy γ -ray beams [24]. The time resolution of the LaBr 3 :Ce detectors was 1 ns (FWHM) for in-beam events, and this allowed us to reject a large fraction of background events.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The efficiency was 0.90% at 1.836 MeV (measured by using a 88 Y source), a value reproduced within 2.0% by a Monte Carlo simulation for this experiment obtained by using the code GEANT4 [23]. At higher energies the efficiency was measured with different radioactive sources and high-energy γ -ray beams [24]. The time resolution of the LaBr 3 :Ce detectors was 1 ns (FWHM) for in-beam events, and this allowed us to reject a large fraction of background events.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…8 show the peak channel numbers before and after saturation obtained from the low-current data. It is noted that energy non-linearity was also reported for LaBr 3 (Ce) detectors with different PMTs [6].…”
Section: Multi-photon Spectra At 40 Mevmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Also, the predictable non-linearity of SiPMs, due to geometrical reasons, is a great advantage compared to PMTs. Indeed, the latter exhibit non-deterministic linearity, especially for high-energy γ-rays [27]. The pixelated nature of the detection surface allows the reconstruction of the γ-ray interaction point inside the crystal, thus the correction of the relativistic Doppler broadening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%