2020
DOI: 10.1177/1077546320921635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response control of cable-stayed arch bridge using modified hanger system

Abstract: Vertical or inclined cables which are placed in bridges as a hanger system affect the dynamic performance of bridges. Inclined hangers can be used instead of vertical hangers to improve the stability of the bridge aerodynamically. However, inclined hangers are susceptible to fatigue more than vertical ones. Considerable signs of distress or slackness might be shown by some inclined hangers because of their location on the bridge. In this study, a cable-stayed arch bridge with vertical and inclined hangers has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a long span, the bridge needs to have supports in the middle, called a continuous beam bridge. The performance of the bridge is increased by providing carbon cables, and strips, prestressed concrete, composite box girder, and fiberglass reinforced foam concrete [6][7][8][9][10][11] Arch bridge use curve structures to provide more resistance to bending forces. Instead of pushing straight down, the weight of an arch bridge is carried outward along the curve of the arch to the supports at each end [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long span, the bridge needs to have supports in the middle, called a continuous beam bridge. The performance of the bridge is increased by providing carbon cables, and strips, prestressed concrete, composite box girder, and fiberglass reinforced foam concrete [6][7][8][9][10][11] Arch bridge use curve structures to provide more resistance to bending forces. Instead of pushing straight down, the weight of an arch bridge is carried outward along the curve of the arch to the supports at each end [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Per (1987) proposed a network arch bridge and it saves half the weight of steel compared with similar spans of conventional steel bridges. Farahmand and Barghian (2020aBarghian ( , 2020b proposed a cable-stayed arch bridge with a hanger system and the stiffness and human comfort level for the bridge were well improved by modifying the hanger system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ese methods can enhance the torsional stiffness of the girder, thus improving the stability and safety of the structure. Also, by changing the form of cable frames [17,18] and adjusting vertical interval and numbers of cable frames [19], some scholars have improved the stiffness of the structure, reduced vibration, and strengthened the dynamic behavior of the bridge. However, these methods increase the stability of the bridge structure merely at a higher cost and do not really solve the problem that the torsional stiffness simulation of the girder is distorted when the bridge structure is simulated by the IBEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%