1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600054368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response by sugar beet to various amounts and times of application of sodium chloride fertilizer in relation to soil type

Abstract: SUMMARYTwo-thirds of the sugar-beet crop in the U.K. receives sodium chloride as part of the fertilizer programme. It is well known that the crop responds profitably on sandy soils which contain relatively little sodium and potassium, and most of these fields now receive sodium chloride. Few crops on clays, silts and organic soils are treated because the value of sodium chloride has never been clearly defined. Thus 36 field experiments were made over the 5 years 1975–9 on contrasting soil types testing five am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the species examined, the Chenopodiaceae, including the important crops spinach, beet, and sugar beet, have received particularly detailed attention, both in terms of physiological and field investigation (Larson and Pierre 1953;Lehr and Wybenga 1955;Tinker 1965;El-Sheikh et al 1967;Draycott et al 1970;Judel and Kuhn 1975;Draycott and Durrant 1976;Jeschke 1977;Milford et al 1977;Durrant et al 1978;Draycott and Bugg 1982;Flowers and Läuchli 1983;Nunes et al 1984;Pessarakli and Tucker 1985;Peck et al 1987;Magat and Goh 1990;Haneklaus et al 1998;Subbarao et al 1999a, b). Beneficial effects in this family are pronounced, and this may well relate to their ecological habit as ruderal, r-strategic, species (Desplanque et al 1999), capable of substantial growth rates and physiological flexibility in response to rapidly changing environments.…”
Section: Sodium As a Nutrientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the species examined, the Chenopodiaceae, including the important crops spinach, beet, and sugar beet, have received particularly detailed attention, both in terms of physiological and field investigation (Larson and Pierre 1953;Lehr and Wybenga 1955;Tinker 1965;El-Sheikh et al 1967;Draycott et al 1970;Judel and Kuhn 1975;Draycott and Durrant 1976;Jeschke 1977;Milford et al 1977;Durrant et al 1978;Draycott and Bugg 1982;Flowers and Läuchli 1983;Nunes et al 1984;Pessarakli and Tucker 1985;Peck et al 1987;Magat and Goh 1990;Haneklaus et al 1998;Subbarao et al 1999a, b). Beneficial effects in this family are pronounced, and this may well relate to their ecological habit as ruderal, r-strategic, species (Desplanque et al 1999), capable of substantial growth rates and physiological flexibility in response to rapidly changing environments.…”
Section: Sodium As a Nutrientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been attributed mainly to the beneficial effect of sodium (Na) (Sayre & Shafer 1944;Crowther 1947;Adams 1961;Tinker 1965;Draycott & Durrant 1976;Hamid & Talibudeen 1976;Draycott & Bugg 1982), although chloride (CI) has also been shown to be beneficial (Tottingham 1919;Broyer et al 1954;Ulrich & Ohki 1956;Johnson et al 1957). Furthermore, it has been suggested that the addition ofNaCI may have a beneficial effect on the potassium (K) status of beet crops because: (1) displacement of K by Na from the exchange complex increases K in soil solution; and/or (2) high CI in soil solution increases K uptake (Lill et al 1938;Sayre & Shafer 1944;Russell 1952).…”
Section: Received27 July 1988; Accepted 14 December 1988mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations for application of K, P, Na and ploughing application of the two nutrients to be Mg fertilizer for the sugarbeet crop have to take many superior. Draycott & Bugg (1982) and Armstrong & factors into account (Jaggard et al 1989). K and Na, found little yield difference between when broadcast shortly before drilling, may reduce applying Na pre-ploughing or in the seedbed, as long the number of seedlings due to osmotic stress, as the later application did not interfere with Applications made after ploughing and when the soil germination.…”
Section: Time Of Application and Chemical Form Of Potassiummentioning
confidence: 99%