2016
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Assessment in Paediatric Phase I Trials According to RECIST Guidelines: Survival Outcomes, Patterns of Progression and Relevance of Changes in Tumour Measurements

Abstract: Introduction. RECIST guidelines constitute the reference for radiological response assessment in most paediatric trials of anticancer agents. However, these criteria have not been validated in children. We evaluated the outcomes and patterns of progression of children/adolescents enrolled in phase I trials in two paediatric drug development units. Methods. Patients aged ࣘ21 assessed with RECIST (v1.0 or v1.1) were eligible. Clinico-radiological data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U and log-rank tests to corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In pediatric phase I trials, we have previously shown that the grade of tumor shrinkage, by RECIST, also correlates with the duration of response and the OS [17]. But importantly, in agreement with previous reports [7,17], in our cohort patients with CNS tumors who achieved disease stabilization had survival rates comparable to those with objective responses. These findings suggest that novel targeted therapies, even if they cannot induce significant tumor shrinkage, may halt tumor growth sufficiently as to confer a survival advantage for some patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In pediatric phase I trials, we have previously shown that the grade of tumor shrinkage, by RECIST, also correlates with the duration of response and the OS [17]. But importantly, in agreement with previous reports [7,17], in our cohort patients with CNS tumors who achieved disease stabilization had survival rates comparable to those with objective responses. These findings suggest that novel targeted therapies, even if they cannot induce significant tumor shrinkage, may halt tumor growth sufficiently as to confer a survival advantage for some patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In adults enrolled in phase I trials, it has been shown a nearlinear relationship between tumor shrinkage assessed by RECIST and OS [16]. In pediatric phase I trials, we have previously shown that the grade of tumor shrinkage, by RECIST, also correlates with the duration of response and the OS [17]. But importantly, in agreement with previous reports [7,17], in our cohort patients with CNS tumors who achieved disease stabilization had survival rates comparable to those with objective responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Limitations of assessing size alone in paediatric brain tumours include interobserver variability, nonspecific enhancement, and variable correlation between decreased tumour size and survival . These issues become particularly relevant in the context of drug development, where the majority of patients deriving benefit from pediatric phase I trials present stable disease rather than objective responses . Hence, there is an increasing interest in incorporating imaging methods, capable of assessing specific tissue properties, into clinical trials to refine response assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective review of Phase 1 adult cancer trials found that change in tumor size by RECIST had a near‐linear association with survival with no significant cutoff points. A retrospective study of Phase 1 pediatric trials found that change in tumor size by RECIST had a linear association with response duration, and was associated with overall survival (OS), but not progression‐free survival (PFS). RECIST often does not apply to patients with relapsed/refractory HR‐NB, since bone and bone marrow (BM) are the most common relapse sites, and measurable soft tissue disease may not be present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%