2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response and feedback of C mineralization to P availability driven by soil microorganisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With C addition, CO 2 emission rate increased dramatically and showed a pulse response, whereas a monotonic declining pattern was observed for all soils without C addition (Figures 1 and 3). This supports the idea that the microorganisms in the soils collected from the field might have limited access to readily available C. The pulse response pattern is common in response to C substrate addition (Cleveland et al, 2002;Kuzyakov, 2010;Tian et al, 2014), although some incubation studies report a decline of CO 2 emission rates due to rapid metabolism of the labile C substrate (e.g., Bradley-Cook, Petrenko, Friedland, & Viginia, 2016;Jing et al, 2017;Tian et al, 2014;Zhou, Hui, & Shen, 2014). Increasing emissions with C addition could indicate the growth of the microbial population, decomposition of the added labile substrate and/or increasing microbial activity through the priming (Blagodatskaya & Kuzyakov, 2008;Blagodatsky et al 2010;Mehnaz et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With C addition, CO 2 emission rate increased dramatically and showed a pulse response, whereas a monotonic declining pattern was observed for all soils without C addition (Figures 1 and 3). This supports the idea that the microorganisms in the soils collected from the field might have limited access to readily available C. The pulse response pattern is common in response to C substrate addition (Cleveland et al, 2002;Kuzyakov, 2010;Tian et al, 2014), although some incubation studies report a decline of CO 2 emission rates due to rapid metabolism of the labile C substrate (e.g., Bradley-Cook, Petrenko, Friedland, & Viginia, 2016;Jing et al, 2017;Tian et al, 2014;Zhou, Hui, & Shen, 2014). Increasing emissions with C addition could indicate the growth of the microbial population, decomposition of the added labile substrate and/or increasing microbial activity through the priming (Blagodatskaya & Kuzyakov, 2008;Blagodatsky et al 2010;Mehnaz et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Increases in bacterial gene copy numbers were also observed with CNP additions, but the shift in the fungal to bacterial ratio indicates a distinct response on the part of fungi. The dramatic increase in CO 2 emission rates was due to the addition of the readily available C substrate, glucose, which stimulated microbial metabolism (Jia et al, 2013;Jing et al, 2017) and tended to increase the abundance of fungi and the fungal to bacterial ratio, but only when additional nutrients were supplied. This implies that the addition of C, N and P together enhanced microbial reproduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous investigations, we found that soils with balanced fertilizations typically have higher carbon sequestration efficiency than that of P-deficient treated soils ( Zheng et al, 2009 ). More recently, we found that P-deficiency decreases the retention of exogenous labile C in soil through increases in soil microbial respiration ( Jing et al, 2017 ). Therefore, under P-deficient fertilizations, a significant amount of C is readily lost as CO 2 through respiration, resulting in a lower percentage of C retained as biomass in soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al, 2015a), and, given the highly interconnected relationship between C and N, this is unsurprising. In addition, potential priming effects have also been identified for other nutrients such as P (Jing et al, 2017;Kuzyakova et al, 2000;Nottingham et al, 2016Nottingham et al, , 2012 and S (Chapman, 1997;Lefroy et al, 1994;O'Donnell et al, 1994), however, these have been covered to a far less extent in since N is a more commonly limiting nutrient in agricultural ecosystems.…”
Section: N-mining Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%