1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00494.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of probe tip penetration may be influenced by factors such as thickness of the probe, pressure applied, tooth contour, tooth position, presence of calculus, degree of periodontal inflammation, and the actual level of connective tissue fibers. [13][14][15][16][17][18] As a result, probing measurements may overestimate attachment loss by as much as 2 mm in untreated sites, while underestimating attachment loss by an even greater margin following treatment. 19,20 The development of automated, controlled force probes has reduced some of the operatorrelated error and subjectivity inherent in manual probing techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of probe tip penetration may be influenced by factors such as thickness of the probe, pressure applied, tooth contour, tooth position, presence of calculus, degree of periodontal inflammation, and the actual level of connective tissue fibers. [13][14][15][16][17][18] As a result, probing measurements may overestimate attachment loss by as much as 2 mm in untreated sites, while underestimating attachment loss by an even greater margin following treatment. 19,20 The development of automated, controlled force probes has reduced some of the operatorrelated error and subjectivity inherent in manual probing techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%