2022
DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responding to research evidence in Parliament: A case study on selective education policy

Abstract: This research focuses on how members of the UK Parliament engaged with evidence in relation to the policy decision leading to the Selective Schools Expansion Fund, a policy designed to enable the existing 163 English grammar schools to apply for additional funds to expand their intake. Although a small case study, the narrow focus provides a fertile setting for analysis of the relationship between research evidence, parliamentary debates and policy decisions.The article provides contextual background in relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UK Parliament and Select Committees on education have frequent discussions and debates on education policies. Bainbridge et al (2022) analysed the transcribed debates by these parliamentarians about increasing the number of students in selective grammar schools in England. The findings suggest that weak and isolated evidence is cherry‐picked by policy makers to support their already determined side of the argument.…”
Section: Do Users Actually Use Evidence?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UK Parliament and Select Committees on education have frequent discussions and debates on education policies. Bainbridge et al (2022) analysed the transcribed debates by these parliamentarians about increasing the number of students in selective grammar schools in England. The findings suggest that weak and isolated evidence is cherry‐picked by policy makers to support their already determined side of the argument.…”
Section: Do Users Actually Use Evidence?mentioning
confidence: 99%