2011
DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20100504-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responding to Poor-Quality Care During Research in Nursing Homes

Abstract: For nurse researchers, responding appropriately to resident abuse is straightforward: The abuse must be reported. However, responding to care that is of poor quality-where care practices are problematic but do not meet the definition of reportable abuse-is not so straightforward. Decision making may be influenced by ethical and professional principles, as well as self-interest to complete a research project. The purpose of this article is to provoke a dialogue about a dilemma faced by many researchers conducti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, inability to manage activities of daily living independently is a common excuse for admission of older people to a nursing home. 2 This bears significant new considerations of delivery of health care systems to the country and increases demand for medical care and nursing homes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, inability to manage activities of daily living independently is a common excuse for admission of older people to a nursing home. 2 This bears significant new considerations of delivery of health care systems to the country and increases demand for medical care and nursing homes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that should participants disclose dangerous practices which suggest the potential for harm to others researchers should consider divulging this information to an appropriate authority or professional (Johnson & Long, 2015). However, responding to care that is of poor quality, where care practices are problematic, but do not meet the definition of reportable abuse, is not so straightforward (Krause et al, 2011). In this study, anecdotes of poor nursing practice around the use of PRN medication were recounted by participants however they were recounted about other individuals and were not an account of their own practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This study has identified some poor practices around the use of PRN medication that require discussion from an ethical perspective. When undertaking research within the healthcare setting, there is the potential for researchers to observe poor or unsafe practices or to hear about them (Krause, Palmer, Bowers, & Buckwalter, 2011). It is generally accepted that should participants disclose dangerous practices which suggest the potential for harm to others researchers should consider divulging this information to an appropriate authority or professional (Johnson & Long, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglect maybe understood as an omission by somebody to provide care which they had a duty to provide (Mandelstam, 2014), whereas an error is defined as a "failure of a planned action to be completed as intended or use of a wrong plan to achieve an aim" (Kohn et al, 1999); it does not always result in harm (Chamberlain et al, 2012). Responding to poor quality-of-care which does not reach the definition of reportable neglect or abuse is noted to be problematic (Krause et al, 2011). The UK prevalence survey of the abuse of older people utilises the term mistreatment to refer to all forms of abuse (psychological, physical, sexual and financial) and neglect (O'Keeffe et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, Krause et al (2011) established that there are varying definitions of reportable abuse in different states. The Welsh Neglect Project found evidence that there is a lack of a coherent and shared view about what constitutes neglect (Stevens and Laing, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%