“…Although there is evidence that the subject of community, central to DR at inception, is integrated into DR programming on the ground, a review of the American literature—which is the focus of this paper—reveals that recent DR literature has focused largely on operations and implementation from an agency perspective. Some of key debates in this context include ongoing discussion about whether DR adequately protects the safety of children (English, Wingard, Marshall, Orme, & Orme, ; Loman & Siegel, , ; Winokur, Ellis, Drury, & Rogers, ), the cost of DR programs compared to investigative response (QIC‐DR, ; Winokur et al, ), how the level of risk is determined (Alaggia, Gadalla, Shlonsky, Jenney, & Daciuk, ; Harries, Cant, Bilson, & Thorpe, ; Merkel‐Holguin & Bross, ), and parent or guardian perceptions of the service delivery method (Merkel‐Holguin, Hollinshead, Hahn, Casillas, & Fluke, ). Our interest is in the role of community in DR, a topic that has received little attention in recent literature.…”