2021
DOI: 10.18502/jder.5638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responding to Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Providing Reproductive Health Services in Humanitarian Settings

Abstract: The article's abstract is not available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, 55 articles entered the quality assessment stage. The full text of these studies was reviewed based on the critical appraisal skills program (CASP) checklist [33], and 40 articles were excluded due to the lack of factors related to the purpose of this systematic review-the role of modern information technology in COVID-19. In addition, among 55 articles reviewed in full text, only three studies used a qualitative method, and these three studies were excluded during the screening stage due to non-compliance with the inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next, 55 articles entered the quality assessment stage. The full text of these studies was reviewed based on the critical appraisal skills program (CASP) checklist [33], and 40 articles were excluded due to the lack of factors related to the purpose of this systematic review-the role of modern information technology in COVID-19. In addition, among 55 articles reviewed in full text, only three studies used a qualitative method, and these three studies were excluded during the screening stage due to non-compliance with the inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the role of modern information technology during the COVID-19 pandemic was elucidated according to the blueprint of the researcher-made analysis. Two authors evaluated the articles separately using the quality evaluation checklist [33]. All the studies included in this systematic review were reviewed independently based on the checklist questions.…”
Section: Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation