2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1203-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respondents’ report of a clinician-diagnosed depression in health surveys: comparison with DSM-IV mental disorders in the general adult population in Germany

Abstract: BackgroundRespondents’ report of a previously diagnosed depression by a health professional is frequently used to estimate depression prevalence. This study contributes to a better understanding of survey results based on this measure by comparing it with a comprehensive standardized diagnostic interview.MethodsData came from the cross-sectional nationwide German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1) and its mental health module (DEGS1-MH, n = 4483). In DEGS1, participants were asked wheth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(69 reference statements)
2
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, findings from national health care data suggest that the validity of medical depression diagnoses are questionable, particularly in primary care [62], and that improving treatment targeting [63,64] and treatment quality [19,[65][66][67][68] are desirable. In conclusion, these findings highlight the need for national public health initiatives in Germany to reduce barriers to accessing mental health care services in general and in individuals with low education in particular, to strengthen awareness using targeted information campaigns, and to improve the quality of medical recognition and specialized treatment provision for depression and its different courses.…”
Section: Public Health Implications and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, findings from national health care data suggest that the validity of medical depression diagnoses are questionable, particularly in primary care [62], and that improving treatment targeting [63,64] and treatment quality [19,[65][66][67][68] are desirable. In conclusion, these findings highlight the need for national public health initiatives in Germany to reduce barriers to accessing mental health care services in general and in individuals with low education in particular, to strengthen awareness using targeted information campaigns, and to improve the quality of medical recognition and specialized treatment provision for depression and its different courses.…”
Section: Public Health Implications and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with prior research showing that self-reports of depression in conjunction with other mental health conditions are reliable proxies for major depressive disorder. (21,22) Appendix Table A3 shows that this approach yields a conservative estimate of the burden of SMI. To access the Appendix, click on the Appendix link in the box to the right of the article online.…”
Section: Future Americans Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grundsätzlich kann keine Schließung spezifischer Versorgungslücken nachgewiesen werden, die bspw. für junge Menschen (vor allem Frauen) diskutiert werden [31,32] und einen differenziellen Zuwachs in dieser Bevölkerungsgruppe als wünschenswert nahelegen würden. Im Gegensatz zu den vorliegenden Ergebnissen zeigt sich diese Entwicklung in GKV-Analysen administrativer Depressionsdiagnosen auf Basis eines längeren Beobachtungszeitraums (2005 -2016) [17] sowie in Befragungsdaten zur fachärztlichen Inanspruchnahme psychiatrischer und psychotherapeutischer Behandlung [16], die auf besondere Zuwächse im jungen Erwachsenenalter hinweisen.…”
Section: Steigende Diagnosehäufigkeiten In Allen Bevölkerungsgruppenunclassified