2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respondent Uncertainty and Ordering Effect on Willingness to Pay for Salt Marsh Conservation in the Brest Roadstead (France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CVM has limitations, however, some of which are associated with any survey (e.g. the method of survey administration, question ordering and respondent certainty) (Voltaire et al, 2017). Specific to CVM, respondents may overstate their WTP (Little & Berrens, 2004; Murphy et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CVM has limitations, however, some of which are associated with any survey (e.g. the method of survey administration, question ordering and respondent certainty) (Voltaire et al, 2017). Specific to CVM, respondents may overstate their WTP (Little & Berrens, 2004; Murphy et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current survey design does not allow us to test for the mid-point/centering bias and we acknowledge this limitation. This bias could be mitigated using the classic and interval payment card (CIPC) format (Voltaire et al, 2017). The CIPC still addresses the uncertainty in CVM but integrates two options: Option A and Option B that are presented simultaneously to respondents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The payment ladder was used as the elicitation format (Hanley et al, 2009;Mahieu et al, 2014;Soeteman et al, 2017;Voltaire et al, 2017;Whittington et al, 2008). It was noted that respondents could be uncertain about their WTP and therefore find it difficult to express it as a single value.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is widely adopted in the literature for estimating the economic value of forest ecosystem services. Molina et al [43] analysed the value of the landscape in an area in the south of Spain, Voltaire et al [46] determined the WTP for the conservation of a salt marsh in France, [47] applied CVM to estimate the value of nature conservation in Finland and [12] estimated the economic value of forest ecosystem services in three counties in China.…”
Section: Evaluation Methods For Willingness To Paymentioning
confidence: 99%