1984
DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(84)90295-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory tract lesions induced by sensory irritants at the RD50 concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentrations of acrolein used in this study are high (22,81, and 249 ppm), compared with the RD50 concentration of 1.7 ppm (26). It would be interesting to determine whether the use of lower concentrations for a longer time to give equivalent doses would have similar effects on peptidergic nerves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentrations of acrolein used in this study are high (22,81, and 249 ppm), compared with the RD50 concentration of 1.7 ppm (26). It would be interesting to determine whether the use of lower concentrations for a longer time to give equivalent doses would have similar effects on peptidergic nerves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mucus layer is important in conditioning the inhaled air and provides a sticky surface for the entrapment of inhaled particles and gases. Because humans are nose breathers, the nasal cavity is the initial site of injury induced by inhaled irritants (12)(13)(14), a common site for particle deposition (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), and a site for the absorption of potentially noxious gases and vapors (21)(22)(23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bei Ratten wurde nur eine Dosis von 0,5 ml/kg KG (ca. 600 mg/kg KG) geprüft, die außer Hautschäden keine weiteren Vergiftungserscheinungen verursachte (Bayer 1970 (Buckley et al 1984). Eine Konzentration von 2 ml/m 3 führte bei Ratte und Maus zu klinischen Anzeichen von Atembeschwerden (Frank 1964), war in einer anderen Untersuchung dagegen ohne Effekt (Zapp 1957).…”
Section: Dermale Aufnahmeunclassified