2014
DOI: 10.1111/irv.12234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory syncytial virus‐ and human metapneumovirus‐associated emergency department and hospital burden in adults

Abstract: Background Little is known about the burden of illness associated with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (HMPV) in adults, especially young adults. Methods We prospectively enrolled Middle Tennessee residents ≥18 years old evaluated in the emergency department (ED) or hospitalized for respiratory symptoms May 2009 through April 2010. We collected samples for RSV and HMPV reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing and obtained demographic and clinical data. Rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
108
4
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
108
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the LOS for patients infected with INF A was reported to be 6.9 days, whereas LOS for patients infected with ADV or hCoV OC43 was 8.2 days and 8.1 days, respectively [14]. In another study, RSV and hMPV infections reportedly resulted in LOS of 4 days and 3 days, respectively [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…the LOS for patients infected with INF A was reported to be 6.9 days, whereas LOS for patients infected with ADV or hCoV OC43 was 8.2 days and 8.1 days, respectively [14]. In another study, RSV and hMPV infections reportedly resulted in LOS of 4 days and 3 days, respectively [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, recent data from the United States shows that RSV disease burden in elderly adults is comparable to influenza. [3,4] Clearly, an effective RSV vaccine could result in a huge reduction in this burden of disease.…”
Section: Rsv Is the Single Most Important Vaccinepreventable Disease mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since hMPV, RSV, and HPIV-3 have been implicated in serious nosocomial outbreaks in adults, we placed patients with hMPV, RSV, or HPIV-3 on standard, contact, and droplet precautions for cough duration and used single rooms when available. [8][9][10] Early in the influenza epidemic here, influenza and ILI patients were given single rooms. Influenza patients had single room priority and cohorting was performed whenever possible.…”
Section: Infection Control Implications Of Protracted Lengths Of Staymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because some viral ILIs (eg, hMPV, RSV, HPIV-3) have potential for nosocomial spread and serious hospital outbreaks, we thought it prudent to put these ILI patients in single rooms. 9,10 Since the viral etiology of ILIs was known by PCR, it was thought that cohorting would decrease the bed burden, but cohorting was of limited value because ILIs of the same type were not in hospital at the same time. Single room availability was further limited by the prolonged LOS of some ILI viruses-for example, RSV (8.1 days) and R/E (8 days).…”
Section: Infection Control Implications Of Protracted Lengths Of Staymentioning
confidence: 99%