1982
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.3.549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory resistance from 1 to 46 ATA measured with the interrupter technique

Abstract: Measurements of respiratory resistance by an interrupter technique were made in six subjects during a Navy saturation dive to 457 m. Repeated measurements were made at five depths with complete pulmonary function testing after the dive. Increase in resistance was about linear with gas density (rho). Three smokers exhibited a significantly steeper slope of the respiratory resistance versus rho relationship than three nonsmokers. The disparity in resistance among the divers became considerable only at great pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Airway resistance at sea level using the P .1 technique are not different from those measured using the esophageal balloon method (179,252). In the past the P .1 was used to estimate P A and to calculate airway resistance in subjects submersed at depths of 45 ATA (63).…”
Section: Work and Energy Cost Of Breathing Underwatermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Airway resistance at sea level using the P .1 technique are not different from those measured using the esophageal balloon method (179,252). In the past the P .1 was used to estimate P A and to calculate airway resistance in subjects submersed at depths of 45 ATA (63).…”
Section: Work and Energy Cost Of Breathing Underwatermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mechanisms that may contribute include the following. 1) Hypoventilation secondary to increased work of breathing may be due to the effects of increased gas density (10). Expiratory flow is limited by an increase in airway resistance, and inspiratory elastic work is increased because of breathing at a higher lung volume (51).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noninvasive, requires minimum patient co-operation and its brevity and the absence of an oscillating column of air suggests that it may be generally better tolerated by young patients than the FOT. Responses such as glottic narrowing are unlikely to occur, because measurements are virtually imperceptible and are made during quiet breathing Recently, the physiological basis and clinical utility of the interrupter technique has been re-evaluated, with some promising results [14][15][16], and theoretical analysis by BATES et al [17] has validated the technique. Although upper airway compliance may lead to an underestimation of airway resistance [18], this can be minimized by supporting the cheeks and floor of the mouth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%