2013
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory muscle specific warm-up and elite swimming performance

Abstract: Abstract:Background:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
30
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…No clear patterns emerged among participants who performed best at a given RWU intensity. In conclusion: (1) an ideal inspiratory pressure exists; (2) previous research shows significant benefits of respiratory training [13,14,17,18]; and (3) individualized performance benefits of 10 of the 11 participants were more than double the standard deviation (±20 s) better than CON during at least one of the RWU conditions. This collective evidence allows us the confidence to conclude the protocol has the potential to provide practically important benefits to the physical performance test.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…No clear patterns emerged among participants who performed best at a given RWU intensity. In conclusion: (1) an ideal inspiratory pressure exists; (2) previous research shows significant benefits of respiratory training [13,14,17,18]; and (3) individualized performance benefits of 10 of the 11 participants were more than double the standard deviation (±20 s) better than CON during at least one of the RWU conditions. This collective evidence allows us the confidence to conclude the protocol has the potential to provide practically important benefits to the physical performance test.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Participants used the same device for all familiarization and experimental trials. The specific RWU volumes and intra-set rest intervals used here replicated procedure used in previous studies [13][14][15][16][17][18]. The device was specifically chosen because it is inexpensive, portable, and allows the amount of airflow restriction to be adjusted (range of 3-13 mm), making it a realistic option for practitioners.…”
Section: Experimental Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations