1979
DOI: 10.1016/0007-0971(79)90045-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory illness, maternal smoking habit and lung function in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also impaired lung function caused during early childhood may predispose to respiratory diseases such as bronchitis later in life. 6 28 29 It must be borne in mind that the coughs were self reported by the children, and what is considered to be "a lot of coughs" may vary from one child to another. Nevertheless, the term is probably a reasonably good measure because it expresses the child's own feelings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also impaired lung function caused during early childhood may predispose to respiratory diseases such as bronchitis later in life. 6 28 29 It must be borne in mind that the coughs were self reported by the children, and what is considered to be "a lot of coughs" may vary from one child to another. Nevertheless, the term is probably a reasonably good measure because it expresses the child's own feelings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because maternal smoking has a greater effect than paternal smoking, it also may influence asthma in utero by limiting lung development (197)(198)(199)(200)(201)(202)(203)(204)(205)(212)(213)(214). In addition, average concentrations of room air samples may underpredict the levels in a child's breathing zone because mothers often hold their small children.…”
Section: Ets Haps and Asthmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…108 We have made explicit the differences in definitions publications, [25][26][27] two publications from a European collaborative study were more clearly pre-where possible but in many instances no clear definition was given (indicated by a question sented as part of that, 28 29 five related to studies already included, [30][31][32][33][34] four studies presented mark in the tables). data on other end points, [35][36][37][38] one was based on sharing a room with a smoker, 39 two were not population based, 40 41 and four publications   related to a study from which we could not For each study for a given symptom measure extract data. [42][43][44][45] we sought to obtain an odds ratio (rather than Where studies resulted in more than one relative risk) and its 95% confidence limits for publication we have used all available infour exposures: any exposure in the household formation to extract the data we sought.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%