1969
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1969.14.4.0475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory Energy Expenditure by the Predaceous Zooplankter Leptodora Kindtii (Focke) (Crustacea: Cladocera)1

Abstract: Respiratoryexpenditure energy budgets were determined for a natural population of the predaceous zooplankter Leptodoru kin&ii during two growing seasons. Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, and RQ were determined under a variety of laboratory conditions. Lemdora demonstrated a respiratory regulatory plateau over the temperature range 15 to 2.X. Oxygen consumption was highest for males and lowest for fecund females. Annual population maintenance cost (respiration) was calculated to be 22.5 kcal rnw8 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not widespread, the presence of this type of metabolic regulation has been suggested for C. trivittatus (this study) and for Neomysis (A. W. Knight, personal communication) and reported for the vertically mi-grating cladoceran, Leptodera (Moshiri et al 1969). The presence of metabolic adaptations to decrease the effect of high temperature on respiration rate would tend to make it less costly to move up into warm water.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although not widespread, the presence of this type of metabolic regulation has been suggested for C. trivittatus (this study) and for Neomysis (A. W. Knight, personal communication) and reported for the vertically mi-grating cladoceran, Leptodera (Moshiri et al 1969). The presence of metabolic adaptations to decrease the effect of high temperature on respiration rate would tend to make it less costly to move up into warm water.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The presence of metabolic adaptations to decrease the effect of high tern-, perature on respiration rate would tend to make it less costly to move up into warm water. Although not widespread, the presence of this type of metabolic regulation has been suggested for C. trivittatus (this study) and for Neomysis (A. W. Knight, personal communication) and reported for the vertically mi-grating cladoceran, Leptodera (Moshiri et al 1969). If respiration rate did not decrease as temperature decreased, the potential energy gain from a reduced metabolic rate at low temperature would not be realized.…”
Section: The Energetics Of Vertical Migrationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Both the dependent variables and animal size were transformed to their decimal logarithms because such transformations usually linearize interspecific body size relations (Brody 1945;Bonner 1965;Peters 1983 Ambler and Frost 1974;Anraku and Omori 1963;Baudouin and Ravera 1972;Bogdan and McNaught 1975;Comita 1968;Comita and Schindler 1963;Conover 1959;Durbin and Durbin 1978;Harvey 1937;Hebert 1978;Heinle 1966;Kryutchkowa and Rybak 197 1;Lemcke and Lampert 1975;McMahon and Rigler 1965;Marshall and Orr 1955;Moshiri et al 1969;Nival et al 1974;Omori 1970;Rakusa-Suszczewski et al 1976;Ryther 1954;Sameoto 1976;Sushchenya 1958;Taguchi and Ishi 1972. ) feeding rates may not be monotonic functions of temperature (Kersting and Van der Leeuw 1976;Zankai and Ponyi 1976), food concentration (Richman 1966;Rigler 197 1;Frost 1975;Mullin et al 1975;Muck and Lampert 1980;Downing 198 1;Porter et al 1982), or food particle volume (Allan et al 1977;McQueen 1970;Nival and Nival 1976).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed o u t by WINBERG (1976) metabolic levels can only be compared analytically on the basis of an evaluation of the A parameter values if the magnitudes of the coefficients I% are equal or a t least close. The values of I% are also known t o be extremely variable under similar experimental conditions for numerous reasons including differences in the physiological conditions of individuals from different age groups (THORSEN, 1952), retention time in the laboratory prior to experiment (RAZOULS 1972; MORGAN and WILDER, 1936;MOSHIRI et al, 1969; and others), insignificant, but often hardly perceptible, procedural deviations during tests (WINBERG, 1976), and a too small number of samples and narrow size range of observations (VILENKIN, 1966; IVLEVA, 1973 b). In the last case, the coefficient I% may vary due to the higher activity of large individuals since it is known that activity is essentially not only a function of temperature, but also of body mass (IVLEVA, 1963).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%