2003
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2263011732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiration-induced Attenuation Artifact at PET/CT: Technical Considerations

Abstract: Combined positron emission tomographic (PET)/computed tomographic (CT) scanners allow the use of CT data for attenuation correction of PET images. Eight patients with cancer underwent PET/CT scanning. Transmission scanning was performed with conventional attenuation correction and with CT scanning during maximum inspiration and normal expiration. Image quality was visually compared and fluorine 18 activities were measured in volumes of interest in the lung and myocardium. Analysis of variance for repeated meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in line with a recent study by Utsunomiya et al [12], who found that the accuracy of AC was higher with use of a free-breathing and post-exhalation breath-hold protocol during CT scanning than with the inspiration breath-hold protocol. Similarly, Goerres et al [11] reported that the normal postexhalation breath-hold protocol for CT acquisition proved superior compared with deep inspiration for PET-CT image registration. Nevertheless, differences between AC INSP and AC EXP were minimal in our study, as accurate correction for misalignment was performed for each individual scan and AC method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are in line with a recent study by Utsunomiya et al [12], who found that the accuracy of AC was higher with use of a free-breathing and post-exhalation breath-hold protocol during CT scanning than with the inspiration breath-hold protocol. Similarly, Goerres et al [11] reported that the normal postexhalation breath-hold protocol for CT acquisition proved superior compared with deep inspiration for PET-CT image registration. Nevertheless, differences between AC INSP and AC EXP were minimal in our study, as accurate correction for misalignment was performed for each individual scan and AC method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous studies have suggested that acquisition of the CT attenuation map with free breathing and postexhalation breath-hold resulted in better matching with SPECT and PET images than did acquisition with post-inhalation breath-hold [11,12]. By contrast, CCS is routinely performed during deep inspiration.…”
Section: Ct Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 8 12 ) This is particularly true when the region of interest is at a boundary between tissue types of different densities, most significantly, at the lung/diaphragm interface. ( 11 , 13 , 14 ) It has been reported that using CT data acquired at deep inspiration can produce severe artifacts, ( 15 ) and also that CT protocols using normal expiration breath‐hold or partial breath‐hold acquisition can reduce artifacts in this region. ( 15 , 16 ) Others have proposed that errors due to attenuation correction can be reduced by using a Cine‐CT to produce an averaged (or max) image dataset for correction purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any form of patient movement and respiratory motion leads to erroneous attenuation correction factors resulting in degraded emission images [29,44]. CT scans often acquire a peak inspiration, whereas PET scans collect an averaged respiratory cycle.…”
Section: Additional Challenges For Ct-based Attenuation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%