2009
DOI: 10.1353/sof.0.0191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resources That Make You Generous: Effects of Social and Human Resources on Charitable Giving

Abstract: The authors thank René Bekkers, Theo Schuyt and the anonymous reviewers of Social Forces for their comments and suggestions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
124
1
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
124
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows that the majority of donations occur as a response to a solicitation, and that the way the potential donors are solicited determines whether the solicitation is effective [38]. Much of this research has explored the impact of the number of solicitations businesses receive [49][50][51], the causes of "donor fatigue" [52], and the effectiveness of direct (a personal request) vs. indirect (a letter) solicitation [38]. Examining the various ways that food redistribution organisations approach and solicit food businesses to donate their surplus food will be interesting to determine whether solicitations for surplus food differ to solicitations for money.…”
Section: Solicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that the majority of donations occur as a response to a solicitation, and that the way the potential donors are solicited determines whether the solicitation is effective [38]. Much of this research has explored the impact of the number of solicitations businesses receive [49][50][51], the causes of "donor fatigue" [52], and the effectiveness of direct (a personal request) vs. indirect (a letter) solicitation [38]. Examining the various ways that food redistribution organisations approach and solicit food businesses to donate their surplus food will be interesting to determine whether solicitations for surplus food differ to solicitations for money.…”
Section: Solicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Rodinný stav Na rozdíly v dárcovství z hlediska rodinného stavu se zaměřuje řada výzkumů [viz Hasens, 2006;Hrung, 2004;Rooney et al, 2005;Mesch et al, 2006;James, Sharpe et al, 2007;Hughes a Luksetich, 2007;Wiepking a Maas, 2009;Marx a Carter, 2014]. Cílem výzkumů Andreoniho a jeho kolegů [Andreoni, Brown a Rischal, 2003] bylo zjistit, zda se v manželství lidé rozhodují stejně jako osoby svobodné, rozvedené či ovdovělé, nebo zda se jedná spíše o společné rozhodnutí.…”
Section: Teoretická Východiska: Vnitřní a Vnější Proměnné Ovlivňujícíunclassified
“…Today, this is still an important function of the educational system (Hurrelmann 2002). But education not only instills pro-social values, it also enables people to acquire important cognitive competences, like verbal ability (Wiepking and Maas 2009) and reading and writing skills, that improve their qualifications for doing voluntary work. Cognitive competence, therefore, is one of the most important factors explaining the effect of education on volunteering (Gesthuizen and Scheepers 2012).…”
Section: Changes In the Proportion Of Highly Educated In The Dutch Pomentioning
confidence: 99%