Resources, innovation and investment in the construction industry

Locke, Brian

doi:10.1016/0019-8501(73)90004-7

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Strategic Vision (Locke, 1973), (Tatum, 1989), (Seaden et al, 2003), (Sexton and Barrett, 2004), (Van Moorsel et al, 2007), (Bel, 2010), (Kask, 2011), (Asgari et al, 2013), (Abdul Hamid and Abd. Rahman, 2014), (Cote, 2017) (Fellnhofer, 2017), (Velev and Veleva, 2019), (Madsen and Ulhøi, 2021); Decision Making (Kask, 2011); Entrepreneurship (Nijkamp and Reggiani, 2000), (Cropley, 2006), (Zhang et al, 2009), (Boso et al, 2013), (O'Brien, 2015, (Fellnhofer, 2017), (Zhu and Cheung, 2017), (Kallmuenzer, 2018), (Velev and Veleva, 2019), (Nevzorova and Karakaya, 2020), (Wadhwani et al, 2020), (Feng, 2021); Management Priority (Tatum, 1989), (Liddle and El-Kafafi, 2010), (Kramer et al, 2011), , (Gambatese and Hallowell, 2011b), (Fellnhofer, 2017), (Hayuningtyas et al, 2020); Profit/Economic Motivation (Abbot et al, 2006), (Bhuiyan et al, 2017); Improving Firm Performance (Ozorhon and Oral, 2016), (Owolabi et al, 2019); Improving Project Performance (Ozorhon and Oral, 2016); Corporate Social Responsibility (Ozorhon and Oral, 2016); Delegation …”

Section: Top Management Orientationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Organizational Resources (Locke, 1973), (Nam and Tatum, 1997), (Dulaimi et al, 2002), (Blayse and Manley, 2004), (Fortuin et al, 2007), (Paladino, 2007), (Fortuin and Omta, 2009), (Chang and Hughes, 2012), (Abdul Hamid and Abd. Rahman, 2014), (Fellnhofer, 2017), (Diaz-Delgado et al, 2019); Organizational Support for Innovation (Nijkamp and Reggiani, 2000), (Pu et al, 2004), (Chen et al, 2010), (Kask, 2011), , (Gambatese and Hallowell, 2011a), (Gambatese and Hallowell, 2011b), (Von Treuer and McMurray, 2012), (Chan and Liu, 2012), (Abdul Hamid and Abd.…”

Section: Organizational Proficienciesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Do the organizational proficiencies dominate in innovation and can manage the major factors of innovation? A Systematic Literature Review of Last 5 Decades

Newaz¹,

Datta²,

Alam³

2022

JBRMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of the research: Innovation is the key to organizational success in the present complex and competitive business environment. Numerous factors are continuously affecting the innovative performances of the organizations. researchers across the globe, have pointed out different factors and, often, several thematic factors that have been proven with strong positive effect on the innovation activities and innovation outcomes. The research attempted to find out the most dominating factors of innovations in the organizations through an extensive systematic literature review that ranges from 1973 to 2021. Methodology: Resulting on the 102 individual influencing factors of innovation through the literature review, the researchers classified those factors into 10 thematic groups, e.g., culture, HRM functions, top management orientation, external environment, organizational proficiencies, leadership, knowledge management, market pressure and competition, technology adaptation and research and development. Besides, the researchers endeavoured to figure out the interrelationships among the identified dominating factors. Findings: Finally, through couple of propositions, the research successfully identified 5 dominating factors of innovation, e.g., organizational proficiencies, external environment, culture, market pressure and competition, and HRM functions. Among 5, the factors of organizational proficiencies noticed the most dominating. The interrelationships between organizational proficiencies and external environment, culture, market pressure and competition, and HRM functions examined and delivered through an easy-to-understand diagram. Originality and implications: This robust research is very valuable, firstly, it has accumulated the factors of innovation from the studies of last 50 years, secondly, it has established 10 thematic factors of innovation, and thirdly, the research has figured out the most crucial thematic factor of innovation which accelerates innovation and can control the threats of other relevant factors of innovation.

show abstract