2015
DOI: 10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resources and Innovation in Family Businesses: The Janus-Face of Socioemotional Preferences

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
113
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conflict lies at the heart of potential dysfunctional strategies that may lead to negative impacts on the firm. Following Verbeke and Kano () and Miller, Wright, Le Breton‐Miller, and Scholes (), we distinguish between functional (i.e., compatible with economic value creation) and dysfunctional (i.e., leading to economic value destruction) noneconomic goal pursuit. Miller et al (, p. 21) label these distinct pursuits of noneconomic objectives as “creating an evergreen organization” versus “feeding parochial family desires,” respectively.…”
Section: Bifurcation Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conflict lies at the heart of potential dysfunctional strategies that may lead to negative impacts on the firm. Following Verbeke and Kano () and Miller, Wright, Le Breton‐Miller, and Scholes (), we distinguish between functional (i.e., compatible with economic value creation) and dysfunctional (i.e., leading to economic value destruction) noneconomic goal pursuit. Miller et al (, p. 21) label these distinct pursuits of noneconomic objectives as “creating an evergreen organization” versus “feeding parochial family desires,” respectively.…”
Section: Bifurcation Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted earlier, the notion of paradox (Lewis, 2000;Smith & Lewis, 2011) and the related notion of duality (Jackson, 1999) are very relevant topics for qualitative inquiry given the characteristics of family firms and their complex or 'Janus-faced' nature (Miller et al, 2015). Another distinctive feature of family firms is the interactions between the individual, the firm and the family.…”
Section: Planning For New Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some refer to traditions from sociology (Martinez & Aldrich, 2014), anthropology (Stewart, 2014), family science (Jennings, Breitkreuz, & Jones, 2014) and psychology (Von Schlippe & Schneewind, 2014) to raise new directions, theories and methods for family business research. But still we lack detailed understanding of what Miller et al (2015) refer to as the 'Janus-faced' nature of family firms and their associated dualistic (Jackson, 1999) and paradoxical tendencies (Lewis, 2000;Smith & Lewis, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managing resources cover managing human resources, financial resources, company reputation, business network, physical resources such as building, machineries and raw materials; capabilities and skill. Miller et al (2015) explain the impact of resources on innovation. Innovation performance is the process outcome of managing company resources to achieve its competitive advantage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%