2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0007485314000844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource partitioning in a ladybird,Menochilus sexmaculatus: function of body size and prey density

Abstract: In the present study, resource partitioning by natural conspecific size variants (small and large) of ladybird, Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabricius) females, in response to varying prey densities was assessed using functional and numerical responses as measures of prey density. The prey provided was small (second) and large (fourth) instars of Aphis craccivora Koch. Results revealed that under choice condition, small and large females of M. sexmaculatus consumed higher number of small and large instars, respect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Kӧhler et al (1987) reported higher conversion efficiencies for the nymphs of central European grasshoppers than the adults. However, in comparison to fourth instars, the higher consumption rates of adult females may be ascribed to their high energy requirements for gonadal development and sexual maturity, since quantity of food influences the rates of development, reproductive output, and the fitness (Barros-Bellanda and Zucoloto 2002; Karsai and Hunt 2002;Moreau et al 2006;Chaudhary et al 2015;Keshavarz et al 2015;Rakhshan and Ahmad 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Kӧhler et al (1987) reported higher conversion efficiencies for the nymphs of central European grasshoppers than the adults. However, in comparison to fourth instars, the higher consumption rates of adult females may be ascribed to their high energy requirements for gonadal development and sexual maturity, since quantity of food influences the rates of development, reproductive output, and the fitness (Barros-Bellanda and Zucoloto 2002; Karsai and Hunt 2002;Moreau et al 2006;Chaudhary et al 2015;Keshavarz et al 2015;Rakhshan and Ahmad 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the predation attributes of coccinellids on aphid prey have been assessed earlier; but these have been under constant trophic resources (Mishra et al 2011(Mishra et al , 2012Kumar et al 2013Kumar et al , 2014aBista and Omkar 2014;Keshavarz et al 2015;Rakhshan and Ahmad 2015). Also, the predatory responses of coccinellids to varying, usually increasing prey densities, have been assessed using functional and/or numerical response experimental designs (Kumar et al 2014b;Behnazar and Madadi 2015;Chaudhary et al 2015;Siddiqui et al 2015). However, the effect of resource fluctuation on predation aspects (consumption rate, conversion efficiency, and growth rate), is underinvestigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some factors may contribute to the performance of aphidophagous insects when feeding on their prey, i.e. optimum foraging behavior by larvae, degree of voraciousness of larvae, the availability of prey (prey density), and larval stage of predator as also shown in other studies by Ofuya (1986) and Chaudary et al (2015) on coccinellid, and Putra and Yasuda (2006) on predatory syrphid. In this study, larvae of M. sexmaculatus tends to be more voracious than I. scutellaris at the 1 st instar larva, although a contrary result was shown at the 3 rd instar.…”
Section: Developmental Time Of Larval Stagementioning
confidence: 60%
“…In addition, the female of coccinellid shows resource partitioning in terms of body size and density of prey. Chaudary et al (2015) revealed that small and big female of M. sexmaculatus tended to prey on small and big instars of aphids, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on the optimisation experiment, the scarce, optimal, and abundant prey biomasses were 2, 10, and 15 mg of aphids per individual beetle per day, respectively. However, the "extremely scarce" and "suboptimal" prey biomasses were found to be 1 and 5 mg of aphids per individual beetle per day, respectively (see Chaudhary et al 2015).…”
Section: Prey Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 98%