1986
DOI: 10.2737/pnw-rn-444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource partitioning among woodpeckers in northeastern Oregon.

Abstract: Eight species of woodpeckers coexist in conifer forests in Foraging habitat and strategies differed. Only the pileated woodpecker excavated extensively in dead wood-particularly in downed wood and in grand fir forests. Northern flickers fed on the ground in open forests or grasslands. Live trees were used by Williamson's sapsuckers and white-headed woodpeckers. Sapsuckers drilled sapwells in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menzeisii (Mirb.) Franco) and the white-headed woodpecker gleaned on ponderosa pine trunks and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to our original hypothesis, however, we found cavities in snags spanning a broad range of diameters and several tree species. Some of this diversity in cavity snag characteristics may be due to differing preferences among PCE species (Bull et al, 1986). It also seems likely, though, that PCE species are flexible in their nesting requirements and select cavity snags based on the “best available” standing snag of acceptable size and wood hardness within a desired location (Lorenz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to our original hypothesis, however, we found cavities in snags spanning a broad range of diameters and several tree species. Some of this diversity in cavity snag characteristics may be due to differing preferences among PCE species (Bull et al, 1986). It also seems likely, though, that PCE species are flexible in their nesting requirements and select cavity snags based on the “best available” standing snag of acceptable size and wood hardness within a desired location (Lorenz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In managing snag populations after wildfire, our study suggests that a strategy that focuses on retaining snag patches containing a broad range of snag diameters (>30 cm dbh) and multiple species could be more beneficial for PCE species than a strategy that focuses primarily on large diameter snags. Diversity in snag diameters and species may promote diversity in PCE species owing to different nesting requirements (Bull et al, 1986). Snag diversity may also expand the temporal window during which snags suitable for cavity excavators are present in a patch, as species and diameter influence snag decomposition and wood decay rates.…”
Section: Cavity Snag Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar (2020) studied the foraging niche differentiation of 10 species of woodpeckers coexisting in Northwest India from six niche dimensions [13]. Bull (1986) surveyed eight species of woodpeckers in Oregon, USA, and observed differences in their foraging sites, foraging strategies, substrate types, and preference for obstacles [32]. Nevertheless, the foraging ecology of woodpeckers in Asia has not been studied in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%