2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Niches of Co-occurring Invertebrate Species at an Offshore Wind Turbine Indicate a Substantial Degree of Trophic Plasticity

Abstract: Offshore wind farms (OWFs) in the North Sea are proliferating, causing alterations in local ecosystems by adding artificial hard substrates into naturally soft-bottom areas. These substrates are densely colonized by fouling organisms, which may compete for the available resources. While the distribution of some species is restricted to specific parts of the turbine, others occur across depth zones and may therefore face different competitive environments. Here we investigate the trophic niches of seven inverte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The isotopic signatures of the benthic Table 6 Standard ellipse areas corrected for small size samples (SEA C -% 2 ) and overlaps (% 2 ) between the isotopic niches of the different fish species collected at the offshore wind turbine (sculpin) and benthopelagic (pouting and juvenile cod) species indicated a diet based on artificial hard substrate prey items, while that of mackerel and horse mackerel showed pelagic feeding preferences. The d 13 C value of sculpin is characteristic of a benthic diet, which is explained by the exploitation of the crab Pisidia longicornis that consumes sediment organic carbon when it occurs at the scour protection layer (Mavraki et al, 2020a). The d 13 C signatures of pouting and cod reflect the signature of the amphipod Jassa herdmani that mainly feeds on zooplankton when it is found on the turbine foundations (Mavraki et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The isotopic signatures of the benthic Table 6 Standard ellipse areas corrected for small size samples (SEA C -% 2 ) and overlaps (% 2 ) between the isotopic niches of the different fish species collected at the offshore wind turbine (sculpin) and benthopelagic (pouting and juvenile cod) species indicated a diet based on artificial hard substrate prey items, while that of mackerel and horse mackerel showed pelagic feeding preferences. The d 13 C value of sculpin is characteristic of a benthic diet, which is explained by the exploitation of the crab Pisidia longicornis that consumes sediment organic carbon when it occurs at the scour protection layer (Mavraki et al, 2020a). The d 13 C signatures of pouting and cod reflect the signature of the amphipod Jassa herdmani that mainly feeds on zooplankton when it is found on the turbine foundations (Mavraki et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The d 13 C value of sculpin is characteristic of a benthic diet, which is explained by the exploitation of the crab Pisidia longicornis that consumes sediment organic carbon when it occurs at the scour protection layer (Mavraki et al, 2020a). The d 13 C signatures of pouting and cod reflect the signature of the amphipod Jassa herdmani that mainly feeds on zooplankton when it is found on the turbine foundations (Mavraki et al, 2020a). The depleted d 13 C values of the pelagic fish species indicate that they consume prey items that rely their diets on primary producers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there is room for improvement for all the cases in applying scientific principles to the collection and analysis of data, beginning with the design of sampling plans, examination of appropriate sampling intervals to capture changes in life history and seasonal signals, trophic interactions, and effects of external factors such as weather patterns and changing climates. Particularly evident was the paucity of studies to address questions related to the potential effects on ecosystem structure, function, and services, as has been shown in other studies [60,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%