Resource Management at World Heritage Sites in China

Do really the Audience's Views Efficiently Boost Built Heritage Conservation Policies?

“…This perhaps results in some confusion in how to balance between the responsibilities of these two main powers, the site"s authority and audience. Consequently, to overcome this dilemma and achieve an efficient conservation policy, Mimi et al (2008), and Su and Li (2012) argue that a clear connection between the site's management structure and its inter-relationships among its decision-makers and inhabitants is essential, which what the study robustly emphasises here.  Fourthly: the vague relationship between the site"s authority and individuals still downgrades the local participatory role in formulating heritage policies (Hughes and Pupavac 2006, Causevic 2011, Huang et al 2012.…”

“…In some cases, the indigenous inhabitants" hardness in accepting some unprecedented concepts and innovative techniques may represent impasse on decision-making processes. In addition, their excessive interpretation of the heritage values, which instead of framing their criticality, may decrease the clarity of the policies (Aas et al 2005, Su andLi 2012). Here, the most appropriated technique to benefit from the local interpretations might be through setting a predetermined trajectories for the locals through which their views can be guided to maintain them tied to a particular issue within the site.…”

“…The latter may escalate the situation in how to planning for the site that subsequently leads to creating conflict mostly centres on the economic potentials behind the diverse cultural values of the heritage. As a consequence, it holds some difficulties regarding coordinating the priorities and responsibilities of each party which increases the intricacy of the site management structure (Su and Li 2012). This perhaps results in some confusion in how to balance between the responsibilities of these two main powers, the site"s authority and audience.…”

“…Excluding the locals from efficient participation in constructing built heritage policies is usually attributed to concerns over the vague role that they would precisely play. Concisely, their hardness in accepting some modernist concepts and techniques in re-presenting heritage values may signify an impasse on decisionmaking process (Aas et al 2005, Su andLi 2012).…”

Delimiting the boundaries of a Mountain Natural Heritage Site through multi-objective modelling

“…Each group is concerned with its specific interests in heritage boundary determination. Experts have mainly prioritized protecting the integrity and authenticity of the heritage value, e. g. by protecting the ecological environment, biodiversity and environmental services (Su & Li 2012). Local government, in contrast, is considered the main market player, prioritizing its own self-interest and inclined to safeguard the region's economic development within the growth of the larger market economy (Wang & Xu 2014).…”