2004
DOI: 10.1080/14650040412331307832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource curse? governmentality, oil and power in the Niger Delta, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
129
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 565 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
129
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is widely argued that the benefits of oil exploration and production accrued to the government have not trickled down to local communities (Watts 2004;Oviasuyi and Uwadiae 2010). The major factor governing the sharing formula is derivation: the proportion of the nation's wealth given back to the source region.…”
Section: Benefits Accruing To Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely argued that the benefits of oil exploration and production accrued to the government have not trickled down to local communities (Watts 2004;Oviasuyi and Uwadiae 2010). The major factor governing the sharing formula is derivation: the proportion of the nation's wealth given back to the source region.…”
Section: Benefits Accruing To Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of the 'landowning group' as the fundamental unit of social and political organisation within the nation-state, and the changing balance of power between 'customary landowners' and government bodies in the negotiation of benefit-sharing agreements, are examples of the scale-making powers of extractive industry projects in resource frontiers or resource-dependent economies (Tsing 2005). While the flow of revenues from such projects has not induced the same degree of political fragmentation in PNG and Solomon Islands as has been documented in Nigeria (Watts 2004), it has still induced an escalation of ethno-territorial claims by representatives of the neo-traditional social order (Allen 2013). …”
Section: Two Points About Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rossport matters, because it is a dispute about ownership and use of natural resources; because it illustrates the threats posed to local communities by a powerful coalition of state and capital; and because, as a consequence, it raises questions of scalar politics and power. In this way, Rossport is part of a longer tradition in geography that focuses on place-based conflicts and struggles (for some recent examples, see Davies, 2005Davies, , 2006Perreault, 2003;Watts, 2004a;Zaup, 2008). The question of how political geographers should engage with this story is, perhaps, more difficult to answer.…”
Section: Insert Fig 1 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%