2016
DOI: 10.5958/2348-7542.2016.00067.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource conservation technology in different paddy ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvement in root zone soil aeration is observed under the SRI due to wider spacing between hills, minimal water use for irrigation and cono-weeding practices (Uphoff et al, 2011;Dass et al, 2015). Kumara et al (2016) observed that aerobic conditions, intermittent irrigation and organic amendments in the SRI led to the increase in soil pH, increase in SOC and soil N contents as compared to the traditional agronomic practices. Increased soil N-availability in the root zone is reported in the SRI method due to higher biological N-fixation under aerobic conditions or availability of N from heterogeneous sources applied in the soil (Das et al, 2018).…”
Section: Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Improvement in root zone soil aeration is observed under the SRI due to wider spacing between hills, minimal water use for irrigation and cono-weeding practices (Uphoff et al, 2011;Dass et al, 2015). Kumara et al (2016) observed that aerobic conditions, intermittent irrigation and organic amendments in the SRI led to the increase in soil pH, increase in SOC and soil N contents as compared to the traditional agronomic practices. Increased soil N-availability in the root zone is reported in the SRI method due to higher biological N-fixation under aerobic conditions or availability of N from heterogeneous sources applied in the soil (Das et al, 2018).…”
Section: Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%