Resource and Capability Constraints to Innovation in Small and Large Plants

Abstract

In an attempt to enhance firm’s competitiveness, policy initiatives have sought to encourage more firms to innovate, with a particular focus on small firms. The success of such initiatives, however, depends on a clear understanding of the factors that are constraining innovation activity, and whether these differ for firms of different sizes. This paper examines those resources and capabilities that firms identify as constraining their innovation activity, the difference in these for small and larger plants and the actual impact of these perceived constraints on the probability of innovating and the degree of innovation success. Drawing on longitudinal data the paper demonstrates that innovation is an evolutionary process with the constraints to innovation being different for small and larger plants. From a policy perspective, initiatives to overcome constraints to innovation in small plants should extend beyond those of finance to include greater networking opportunities, cost reduction programmes and marketing strategies to increase the profit margin on new products, human resource management practices on implementing change and easier access to information about new technologies. In contrast policies to promote innovation in larger plants should focus on minimising the risk of development and enhancing access to specialist expertise. Copyright Springer 2006

Knowledge governance within clusters: the case of small firms

“…Studies on small firms highlight that they often adopt individualistic behaviours to access scarce resources, such as labour, capital or services (Maskell & Lorenzen, 2004). Their lack of managerial skill and cognitive resources limits their ability to perceive opportunities for collaboration (Hewitt-Dundas, 2006;Pillania, 2008). Moreover, they are unable to use external sources to generate new knowledge and innovation, even though these external resources are fundamental to them as they represent the greater part of their knowledge renewal (De Jong & Marsili, 2006;Freel & Harrison, 2006;Pillania, 2008).…”

El marketing interno y la orientación al aprendizaje como antecedentes a la innovación en las pequeñas y medianas empresas en Aguascalientes

“…Las pequeñas y medianas empresas tienen ventajas en términos de prácticas de comportamiento, como el dinamismo emprendedor, la flexibilidad, la eficiencia y su proximidad al mercado (Hewitt-Dundas, 2006). El obtener evidencia empírica que ayude a entender cuáles prácticas de gestión conllevan un mejor desempeño de acuerdo a sus características y contextos particulares, adquiere relevancia si se considera que 99.8 % del total de las empresas en México son micro, pequeñas y medianas empresas, las cuales generan un importante porcentaje del producto interno bruto y del total de recursos humanos empleados (SE, 2013).…”

Do financial constraints threat the innovation process? Evidence from Portuguese firms

“…Namely, a set of resources and capabilities at the human, organizational, networking and legislatory levels, as argued by the resource-based literature, may significantly constrain innovation (e.g. Hewitt-Dundas, 2006). 4 We should note that the impact of public intervention upon financial constraints, that are not specific to the innovation process, has been previously analysed, even though with different methodologies (e.g.…”