1978
DOI: 10.1139/b78-306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource allocation in young plants of two perennial species of Plantago

Abstract: Growth patterns and biomass allocation to component plant parts in Plantago major and P. rugelii were compared under greenhouse conditions. Within 3 months of germination individuals of P. major were larger and had devoted more dry weight to seed and production of ramets than those of P. rugelii regardless of the number and kind of neighbours. No significant differences in percent resource allocation to roots, caudex, leaves, and spikes were observed between plants of P. major subjected to increased interferen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Venable (1984) and Bradshaw (1984) have given a review of recent studies concerning the genetic background of life history variation. Studies concerning the resource allocation in two related Plantago species (P. major and P. rugelli) e.g., showed the existence of adaptations to the level of habitat disturbance (Hawthorn and Cavers, 1978). In the predominantly inbreeding species Piantago major it was found that each population is adapted to its specific habitat: the total genetic variability for morphological characters consisted of a large interpopulational component and a comparatively small intrapopulational component (Van Dijk, 1985;Wolff, in preparation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venable (1984) and Bradshaw (1984) have given a review of recent studies concerning the genetic background of life history variation. Studies concerning the resource allocation in two related Plantago species (P. major and P. rugelli) e.g., showed the existence of adaptations to the level of habitat disturbance (Hawthorn and Cavers, 1978). In the predominantly inbreeding species Piantago major it was found that each population is adapted to its specific habitat: the total genetic variability for morphological characters consisted of a large interpopulational component and a comparatively small intrapopulational component (Van Dijk, 1985;Wolff, in preparation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproductive effort, the proportion of an individual's resources which are devoted to reproduction, is of particular theoretical interest (Harper 1967;MacArthur & Wilson 1967;Gadgil & Bossert 1970;Harper & Ogden 1970;Gadgil & Solbrig 1972) and hence has been described for many species (Abrahamson & Gadgil 1973;Gaines et al 1974;Hickman 1975; van Andel & Vera 1977;Holler & Abrahamson 1977;Roos & Quinn 1977;Hawthorn & Cavers 1978;Bostock & Benton 1979). Reproductive effort has almost invariably been measured by describing biomass or energy allocation, two traits which are highly correlated in plants (Hickman & Pitelka 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large plants will have greater competitive ability for resources in the next growing season. As a result, a long pre‐reproductive period leads to large quantities of seeds in the following year (Hawthorn & Cavers 1978; Kuiper & Bos 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A counterbalance of advantages on the time of this switch can be noticed in relation to the length of the vegetative season and winter cold (Hawthorn & Cavers 1978; Kuiper & Bos 1992). An early switch to a generative phase will ensure progeny production when the season is short and the probability for surviving winter is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%