2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/vtcspring.2015.7146056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Allocation in Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for Future Radio Access

Abstract: This paper investigates a new strategy for radio resource allocation applying a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) scheme. It calls for the cohabitation of users in the power domain at the transmitter side and for successive interference canceller (SIC) at the receiver side. Taking into account multi-user scheduling, subband assignment and transmit power allocation, a hybrid NOMA scheme is introduced. Adaptive switching to orthogonal signaling (OS) is performed whenever the non-orthogonal cohabitation in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical degree of users' gain over a subchannel also plays a crucial role in the decision whether additional user will be allocated to that subchannel or not. Because of these user dynamics, some subchannels cannot be assigned to many users as the allocation of more and more users may decrease the sum-rate as well as its energy efficiency, which is proved in 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total Power Consumption (dBW) 18 Proposition 1. Due to the structure of the formulation, unlike the DC programming-based approach, the GP technique can provide fine-grained energy-efficient power allocation across all subchannel-user tuples.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical degree of users' gain over a subchannel also plays a crucial role in the decision whether additional user will be allocated to that subchannel or not. Because of these user dynamics, some subchannels cannot be assigned to many users as the allocation of more and more users may decrease the sum-rate as well as its energy efficiency, which is proved in 10 20 30 40 50 60 Total Power Consumption (dBW) 18 Proposition 1. Due to the structure of the formulation, unlike the DC programming-based approach, the GP technique can provide fine-grained energy-efficient power allocation across all subchannel-user tuples.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9), we can conclude R n ({1, 3}) > R n ({1, 2}). Moreover, using (18) [31] and then simplifying, R n ({1, 3}) and R n ({3, 2}) are given by R n ({1, 3}) = (15) log 2 (1 + pn(g n 1 ) 1+α (g n 1 ) α +(g n 3 ) α )(1 + pn(g n 1 ) 1+α (g n 1 ) α +(g n 3 ) α +png n 3 (g n 1 ) α ) , R n ({3, 2}) = (16) log 2 (1 + pn(g n 3 ) 1+α (g n 2 ) α +(g n 3 ) α )(1 + pn(g n 2 ) 1+α (g n 2 ) α +(g n 3 ) α +png n 2 (g n…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make this pairing, we need only the rough channel state estimate at the transmitter and not the finer CSI that would be needed in the receiver for decoding the data. This data could be used to decide whether or not to use NOMA and if we use, which users should be paired together [220].…”
Section: Non-orthogonal Multiple Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [13], [14], the authors use fractional transmit power allocation technique among users and equal power allocation concept across subchannels. [15] uses water-filling-based approach for power allocation, and in [16], the authors use difference of convex (DC) programming-based [17] approach for the power allocation in both user and subchannel levels. Energy-efficient downlink resource allocation has also been studied in some papers, such as [18]- [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%