2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-1016-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource allocation for performance improvement

Abstract: In this paper the problem of allocating resources among Decision Making Units is considered. This study covers the case in which several homogeneous units are operating under the supervision of a central unit. The resource allocation is carried out by the DM (central unit) in such a way that the overall performance of the system is improved. Performance is defined by means of a convex combination of the ratio of the efficiencies before and after the resource allocation. It is assumed that each unit is allowed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common Variable Invariance Maximization Cook and Kress (1999) x x Beasley (2003) x x Jahanshahloo et al 2004x x Lozano and Villa (2004) x x Amirteimoori and Kordrostami (2005) x x Cook and Zhu (2005) x x Fang and Zhang (2008) x x Asmild et al (2009) x x Li et al (2009) x x Amirteimoori and Tabar (2010) x x Bi et al 2011x x Lin (2011a) x x Lin (2011b) x x Nasrabadi et al (2012) x x Fang (2013) x x Li et al (2013) x x Lotfi et al (2013) x x Mostafaee (2013) x x Si et al (2013) x x Du et al (2014) x x Fang (2015) x x x x x x . This is due to the fact that some inefficient DMUs could improve their efficiency scores by utilizing these allocated resources and set targets.…”
Section: Weights Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common Variable Invariance Maximization Cook and Kress (1999) x x Beasley (2003) x x Jahanshahloo et al 2004x x Lozano and Villa (2004) x x Amirteimoori and Kordrostami (2005) x x Cook and Zhu (2005) x x Fang and Zhang (2008) x x Asmild et al (2009) x x Li et al (2009) x x Amirteimoori and Tabar (2010) x x Bi et al 2011x x Lin (2011a) x x Lin (2011b) x x Nasrabadi et al (2012) x x Fang (2013) x x Li et al (2013) x x Lotfi et al (2013) x x Mostafaee (2013) x x Si et al (2013) x x Du et al (2014) x x Fang (2015) x x x x x x . This is due to the fact that some inefficient DMUs could improve their efficiency scores by utilizing these allocated resources and set targets.…”
Section: Weights Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we evaluate benefits from averaging emission intensities across multiple electricity generating units. Therefore, we propose a new methodological approach which is similar to the idea of a central planner which optimally divides resources (see Nasrabadi et al 2012) or costs and revenues (see Khodabakhshi and Aryavash 2014) among subunits. Our analysis is comparable to other studies which use production analysis techniques to analyze the economic benefits of emission trading (see Brännlund et al 1998, Färe et al 2013b, and Färe et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nasrabadi et al [31] presented a model to investigate the resource allocation problem based on efficiency improvement. Their model uses parameters which are not necessarily unique in the case of alternative optimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%