2019 15th International Wireless Communications &Amp; Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iwcmc.2019.8766489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Allocation for Beam-hopping User Downlinks in Multi-beam Satellite System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For fixed super-user parameters, changing ω b alters how the radiated power is dispersed across the coverage area, resulting in a change to the maximum gain (and therefore EIRP) at the center of a beam. Assuming that each beam uses a constant BW, the spectral efficiency (η b ) relating to the selected MODCOD defines the beam capacity (Γ) as per Equation (9). Therefore, as users are iteratively allocated to a beam and the super-user parameters updated, the achievable CNR and Γ will be a function of ω b .…”
Section: Modified User Demands and Beam Capacity Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For fixed super-user parameters, changing ω b alters how the radiated power is dispersed across the coverage area, resulting in a change to the maximum gain (and therefore EIRP) at the center of a beam. Assuming that each beam uses a constant BW, the spectral efficiency (η b ) relating to the selected MODCOD defines the beam capacity (Γ) as per Equation (9). Therefore, as users are iteratively allocated to a beam and the super-user parameters updated, the achievable CNR and Γ will be a function of ω b .…”
Section: Modified User Demands and Beam Capacity Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that after MoCHA or WkFRI, we have an initial BLP, with the beam locations and beam widths known; the modified demands of a user with respect to its distance from the beam centers and the beam capacities can be estimated using Equations ( 7) and (9), respectively; the optimization problem of allocating users to beams in order to maximize the total demand covered or total number of users served, subject to constraints on beam capacity and number of users each beam can serve, is a CCKP. We used IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio Version 22.1 for solving the following binary ILP model, using StaticLex that maximizes, in the first instance, the covered demand, and in the second instance, maximize the number of users covered with this optimized covered demand.…”
Section: Cckp and Ipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 8 ] investigated the advantages of beam hopping and showed the performance and capacity improvement over non-hopped systems. Scholars have also proposed a new generation of high-throughput satellite communication system architecture based on beam hopping, and the hopping pattern design is jointly optimized by a convex optimization algorithm [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Li Guangxia’s team also sorted out the existing algorithms for satellite beam hopping resource allocation, and verified the good applicability of beam hopping in high-throughput systems [ 12 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al [30] first analyzed the influence of satellite distance on resource scheduling and proposed an algorithm that combines an improved genetic algorithm and a local search method to rapidly improve the quality of the scheduling scheme. Reference [31] first used the heuristic-based optimization method to coarsely search the feasible region space where the optimal solution is most likely to appear. However, due to the diversity of services and the high dynamics of satellites, the time slot preallocation will not be able to meet the real-time and changeable service requirements well.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%